Abstract:The Philippines' unilateral initiation of the compulsory arbitration on the South China Sea dispute against China,by means of the disguised maritime boundary delimitation dispute concurrently involving the unsettled sovereignty over certain islands and reefs and of full denial of the present and the validity of the Declaration on the Conduct of Parties in the South China Sea(DOC) between them,is incompatible with the requirements set out under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea.However,it does not mean that the initiation of such proceedings by the Philippines is illegal in nature.China's non-acceptance of the arbitration and default of the participation in the arbitral proceedings does not affect the lawful establishment of the China-Philippines Arbitral Tribunal and the legitimacy of its proceedings as well as the validity of the arbitral award thereby unfavorable to China.Therefore,whether China maintains its current policy or reparticipates in the following-up proceedings by the Arbitral Tribunal is an issue worthy of reevaluating.Re-participation ought to be a right choice of policy for China because the legal status of the South China Sea "dotted line" could be argued that the Convention is inapplicable so as to avoid the thorny issue of clarifying its legal status.More important,pursuant to the Southern Bluefin Tuna case Annex VII arbitral tribunal and the 2006 Chinese Declaration,as well as cases related to maritime boundary delimitation or establishment of the outer limits of the continental shelf extending beyond 200 nautical miles,the DOC falls within the "agreement" in article 281(1) of the Convention that precludes the Annex VII compulsory arbitration,and the most parts of the Philippines' claims are not justiciable;consequently,the Arbitral Tribunal should decide that it has no jurisdiction or inadmissibility on the present dispute.Even if continuing to purse its policy of non-participation,by means of "indirect participation",China could publish a formal document after the arbitral tribunal begins its written proceedings that comprehensively rejects the request of the Philippines and objects to the arbitral tribunal's jurisdiction and admissibility on the dispute.

A Study on the Feasibility of Sino-Philippine"Joint Development"in Oil and Gas Resources in the South China Sea

Joint Development in the South China Sea: China’s Incentives and Policy Choices

Deep Structures of the Palawan and Sulu Sea and Their Implications for Opening of the South China Sea

Ocean drilling and major advances in marine geological and geophysical research of the South China Sea

Why Joint Development Agreements Fail: Implications for the South China Sea Dispute

Recent Development and Trend of the South China Sea Issue

Status Quo and Lack of Dispute on South-sea Sovereignty between China and the Philippines in the Eye of International Law

The Origin and Current Situation of the South China Sea Dispute between China and the Philippines

The South China Sea Dispute and the Philippines Arbitration Tribunal: China'S Policy Options

The Sino-Japanese Principled Consensus on the East China Sea Issue: A Commentary

Legal Issues of the China-Philippines Arbitral Tribunal for the South China Sea Dispute

The South China Sea International Disputes with the ASEAN Area (in International Maritime Law)

A Study of the Legal Framework of The Code of Conduct in the South China Sea

The Limits of Intergovernmentalism: The Philippines’ Changing Strategy in the South China Sea Dispute and Its Impact on the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN)

A Proposal for Joint Marine Scientific Research Activities in the Disputed Maritime Areas of the South China Sea

The South China Sea Arbitration Case:A Public Opinion War Waged by U.S. & Philippines

Situation of the South China Sea and Countermeasures Against the New Development of the Law of the Sea

Mischief Reef: Geopolitics and Implications

Territorial Disputes in the South China Sea and China's Strategies

The Maritime Silk Road Initiative and Its Implications for China’s Regional Policy

FOCUS ON CHINA : JURISDICTIONAL CLAIMS, CURRENT PETROLEUM DEVELOPMENT