Abstract:For most of the time during the last two millennia, China was a dynastic empire ruled by an emperor with the assistance of a highly developed mandarinate of imperial organs. “Administrative law” in the modern sense of a set of legal norms enacted by the legislature or developed by the judiciary that simultaneously empower and constrain state organs and officials for the purpose of protecting the rights and liberties of subjects or citizens did not exist in traditional China. But there did exist for more than two millenniums elaborate and sophisticated rules regulating the powers and functions of each component of the highly complex and extensive machinery of imperial organs and officials, and prescribing in detail the duties of officials as well as the multiple and complicated monitoring, supervisory and disciplinary mechanisms applicable to the exercise of powers and performance of duties by officials in different state organs. By the late 19th century, Qing China’s increasing subordination to Western imperialism and semi-colonialism convinced significant numbers of Chinese political and scholarly elite that there was a desperate need for China to “save” and strengthen itself by pursuing modernization. In the legal and political domains, this generally meant extensive borrowing or transplant of Western political and legal institutions. After China's defeat by Japan in the Sino-Japanese War of 1894–1895, Japan’s experience of successful modernisation was widely admired by Chinese intellectuals, and the Japanese model was perceived as one that China should imitate in its self-strengthening efforts. This essay will therefore begin with the introduction and reception of Japanese administrative law in China in the late Qing Dynasty. It will then survey the study of comparative law and the influence of foreign law on the development of Chinese administrative law in the Republic of China era (1911–1949) and after the establishment of the People's Republic of China (1949-). Major developments in Chinese administrative law in both the Republican era and the Communist era will also be briefly outlined as the context of administrative law scholarship. It will be seen that the story of the study of comparative and foreign administrative law in modern China is very closely intertwined with the story of the development of Chinese administrative law itself.

The Historical Review of Anti-terrorism Legislation in China

Choice of Value: Counter- Terrorism Measures and Criminal Procedure——Retrospect and Analysis of the American Counter- Terrorism Law

Unveiling Human Rights Protection in China from the Perspective of Criminal Procedure Law

China: Xi Jinping, China’s legal reform and counterterrorism

Constructing Cybersecurity Discourse Via Deconstructing Legislation

Trend of International Anti-Doping Legislation and Anti-Doping Legislation in China

GOVERNING CHINA’S ADMINISTRATIVE MONOPOLIES UNDER THE ANTI-MONOPOLY LAW: A TEN-YEAR REVIEW (2008–2018) AND BEYOND

Studies on Religion and China’s National Security in the Globalization Era

Thirty Years' Development of China's Anti-monopoly Law under the Yardstick of "State-Market":Toward "Autonomous-Responsive" Law

Administrative Monopoly and the Anti-Monopoly Law: an examination of the debate in China

The Chinese Tradition of Administrative Law

The Vicissitudes of Chinese Criminal Law and Theory

Genesis and evolution of security issues in the history of political and legal thought of Ancient China and Ancient India

Anti-Terrorism Criminal Law: Where Emergency Regime Meets the Investigative Agenda

Anti-domestic violence law: The fight for women’s legal rights in China

Cybersecurity Law and Regulation in China: Securing the Smart State

Chinese Intelligence Science under the New "National Security Law" Background

On the Legal Mechanism of Nuclear Safety in China under the Background of Environmental Protection

Analysis on the Effect of China's Overseas NGO Law under the Differences in Legal Thinking

[Epidemic related laws and regulations and their characteristics in the period of the National Government]

Comparative Study on Crimes of Endangering National Security in Germany and China