Constitutive Requirement and Amount Determination of Illegal Gains--Taking Insider Trading for Example

Ze-sheng XIAO
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1005-0078.2013.04.007
2013-01-01
Administrative law review
Abstract:The confusion between the‘illegal gains’ in the forfeiture proceeding and the‘illegal gains’ as the determining basis of the ifning range is the source of administrative organs’ bogging down in the mud of illegal gains determination. In fact, the former refers to the actual beneifts directly or indirectly gained because of the conducted illegal acts which are harmful to the public interest. Therefore, actual income theory or proift theory should be adopted respectively according to different types of illegal acts and different functions of the forfeited illegal gains. The latter refers to the potential proceeds, i.e. in theory it means the beneifts gained or losses reduced directly from illegal acts which damage public interest or others’ interest, thus the nominal income method is adopted.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?