An Analysis of Quantity of Crime in Certain Articles in the Criminal Act

Yun-teng HU,Shu-de LIU
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1001-2397.2005.05.019
2005-01-01
Abstract:This article details the quantity of crime and the punishments prescribed in articles in the Criminal Act. Article 120 (2) provides subject matters of implicated offenders and provides that combined punishments shall be imposed on them. Article 157 provides that a smuggler involved in interference with public function shall receive combined punishment. Article 171(3) provides that an implicated offender who counterfeits currency and sells or transports the same shall be severely punished in accordance with the crime whichever is graver. One who uses the currency faked by himself/herself shall be deemed an implicated offender while use of the faked currency is an act after the fact that is not punishable. Article 196(3) provides that anyone who, for the purpose of illegally possessing another's personal property, commits theft and in the process unexpectedly gets a credit card and uses the same, shall receive combined punishments in accordance with theft and deception with a credit card. Article 198(2) is concerned with compatible offense and the offender shall be punished in accordance the offense whichever is graver. Article 208(2) is concerned with complicated crime. Article 229(2) is also concerned with complicated crime and the offender shall be punished in accordance of aggravation. Article 241(5) provides that an offender who has no original intent to sell women before the fact but at the time when the crime is committed changes his/her idea and sells abducted women shall receive combined punishments. Article 253(2) provides that anyone who for the purpose of illegal possession commits a theft by way of opening mail shall be severely punished in accordance with theft; whereas the person who opens a letter with purposes other than illegal possession and at the time when he/she is processing changes his/her mind to possess another's property illegally shall not be deemed a complicated offender. Article 399(3) provides that anyone who solicits a bribe or receives a bribe for the purpose of gaining a profit for others and at the same time commits other offences shall be deemed respectively in accordance with the provisions of compatible crimes and complicated crimes.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?