The Payment of Grain to Green Project, the Behavior Choice of Peasants and Their Gains and Losses

LI Guo-ping,SHI Han-yu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1002-2104.2015.05.020

2015-01-01

China Population Resources and Environment

Abstract:A reasonable payment motivates peasants to participate in the Grain to Green Project (GTGP) voluntarily. However, the current payment scheme requires improvement as it lacks the consideration of the dynamic changes and the uncertainty of the peasants’ opportunity cost. In this paper, we estimated the peasants’ income by employing the real option theory. The conversion boundaries of land use in southern and northern regions of China are calculated by considering the uncertainty in agricultural return. The results indicate that the farmer’ s opportunity cost varies with region and time. An efficient payment scheme should adapt to the changing opportunity cost. Thereafter, by choosing wheat and grain as the representative crop for the southern and northern China respectively, the farmer’s opportunity cost is estimated through the historical data from 2002 to 2013. The net income of afforestation in southern and northern is estimated by choosing cedar wood and locust as the representative with the intimal density given by the government regulation for GTGP. The fluctuating increase in pattern of the net income of agriculture is clear in the results. Moreover, the results show that in the period of 2002-2009, the payment from GTGP is higher than agriculture whereas, the income from agriculture is higher in the period of 2010-2013. Finally, we assume the farmer’s opportunity cost from 2014 to 2030 follows a geometric Brownian motion. Comparing the obtained opportunity cost to the conversion boundary, a statistic measure is formulated. The results indicate that the probability of the farmer suffering lost increases as the crop yield increases, and decreases with growing payment. Moreover, there is a higher chance for the farmer in southern China suffering lost under the same crop yield and payment standard. This work lay down theoretical foundation for the next round GTGP . As the central government has set a unified payment despite the difference in region and time, our results suggest that local authorities should supplement the payment to compensate the opportunity cost changes regarding region and time difference. To avoid rich land being converted, local authorities should take the land quality into consideration when choosing which land should be included in GTGP .