General Logic in Comparative Studies

Liu Jia-he,CHEN Xin
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1002-0209.2005.05.010
2005-01-01
Abstract:The theory of Incommensurability in western analytic philosophy and science philosophy could be adopted as a theoretical reference for historic comparison, the latter of which must therefore follow the logic of general comparative study. The present paper makes explications of the general logic of comparative study. These include that (i) comparison is a unification of the principles of incommensurability and commensurability; (ii) the holistic commensurability should not be deduced from that of the local elements of the compared phenomena; (iii) the commensurability and incommensurability of the compared objects may change with the comparative scope or conceptual levels set out by the comparatist; (iv) there would be no knowledge without comparison; (v) the essence of things does not lie completely in the objective existence of the comparatist, it also depends on his theoretical construct; (vi) comparative study is meant to give rise to new identity, and differences in comparison are an origin of creative activities.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?