Abstract:The development of International Relations theory (IRT) in China has been framed by three debates since 1979. The first was about China's opening up to the outside world. It started with the question of whether the world was characterized by ‘war and revolution’ or ‘peace and development’ between orthodox and reformist scholars and continued to focus on China's interest between orthodox scholars and the newly rising Chinese realists. It resulted in a wide acceptance of the reformist argument that peace and development characterized our era and of the realist view that China was a normal nation-state and should have its own legitimate national interest. The second started in the early 1990s and centered on the better way of realizing China's national interest. It was between Chinese realists and liberals. While the former emphasized national power, the latter proposed the alternative approach of international institutions. The third debate was on China's peaceful rise. It evolved at the turn of the century, when all the three major American IRTs, realism, liberalism, and constructivism, had been introduced into China and therefore the debate was more a tripartite contention. Realists believed that it was impossible for any major power to rise peacefully, while liberals and constructivists both supported the peaceful-rise argument. Liberals stressed more the tangible benefits derived from international institutions and constructivists explored more China's identity in its increasing interaction with international society. Although it was Chinese constructivists who explicitly discussed the identity issue, all the three debates and all the debating sides have reflected this century puzzle since the Opium War – China's identity vis-à-vis international society. These debates have helped push forward the IRT development in China and at the same time established Western IRT as the dominant discourse. A new round of debate seems likely to occur and may center on the question of the world order. This time it may help the newly burgeoning but highly dynamic Chinese IRT to develop and contribute to the enrichment of IRT as knowledge of human life.

IChina's Open-up from the Perspective of World History

Marx's Theory of World History:Interpretive Framework for China's Path

The Temporal Features of China's Opening to the Outside World and Its Theoretical Construction

China's Thirty Years of Opening-up:Retrospect and Prospect

Retrospect and Prospect: Development of China’s Economics in the Past 70 Years

Searching China's Cultural Orientation in the Contemporary Internation a Organizations

Development of International Relations theory in China: progress through debates

World history on a par with Chinese history? China's search for world power in three stages

Study of Western Intellectual History in China since the Reform and Opening-up

China's Opening Up after 40 Years: Standing at a Historic Turning Point

China Studies:Its International Perspectives and Indigenous Significances

The Reform-and-Opening Up and the Modernization of Chinese Ideology

Change, Limitations and Transformation - Historical Development and the Impact of European Experience on China’s Transformation

Understanding"Chinese Modernization"in the Context of Modernization History

On China's Perspective in International Studies

Three-dimensional Interpretation of the Unique View of Civilization Embodied in Chinese Modernization

A Theoretical Thinking of Globalization and China's Development Path

The World Vision of Modernization Research:Macro Exploration and Theoretical Enlightenment

Perceiving Truth and Ceasing Doubts: What Can We Learn from 40 Years of China's Reform and Opening up?

The October Revolution Opened a New Era of World History

The Influence of Expanding New Openness Actions on China's Economic Development