A Comparative Study of the Three Games under Heterogeneous Products Markets

Zhigang WANG,Yonggang ZHOU,Shengnan HUANG,Qianlin ZHONG
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1672-0539.2014.01.008
2014-01-01
Abstract:The classic Cournot game,Stackelberg game and Bertrand game indicate the Nash equilibrium solutions under the hypothesis of complete information and product homogeneity market.However,the reality about oligopoly market is hard to satisfy the above hypothesis.This paper broadens the hypothesis of product homogeneities in the classic models,and compares the Nash equilibrium solutions of the three games from the perspective of product heterogeneity.Further,this paper researches that if there is a comparative advantage for the leading firms’Equilibrium profit in the model of Stackelberg game,compared to the other two game equilibrium profits.The result shows that,the outcomes of market equilibrium are dramatically different in these three models,due to the difference between complementary and substitutable products.The equilibrium profit in Stackelberg game is higher than the ones in other two games,no matter whether the products are substitutes or complements.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?