Abstract:Comparison effects have been studied extensively in many fields. In particular, existing operations management articles have discussed the impact of comparison effects on enterprises' production and pricing decisions. Research has also shown that consumers' purchasing decisions are primarily determined by three factors: product quality, selling price, and comparison effects. The current study introduces the concepts of social and temporal comparison effects to examine how comparison effects influence a monopolist’s production quality and pricing strategy for substitutable products. Results reveal the following: (1) Setting different prices for even two types of substitutable products with negligible quality differences can divide customers into three groups under the influence of social comparison effects in a single-stage model. (2) The monopolist should avoid using a price discrimination strategy in which products with a short market life cycle have the same quality but different prices. (3) When the market life cycle of products is sufficiently long in the single-product market and the market with two substitutable products, the monopolist’s optimal choice in the second stage is to keep production quality constant and increase the selling price. Consequently, the number of buyers does not decrease because of temporal comparison effects. Therefore, the firm increases its revenue. (4) For the market with two substitutable products with quality differences, one approximate optimal strategy for the enterprise in the second stage is to keep the selling price constant with the assumption that product quality cannot be adjusted after the first period. At this point, the consumption situation in the market is the same as that in the first stage. Therefore, when no external constraints exist, the monopolist firm can obtain more benefits in the second stage than in the first stage by exploiting the temporal comparison effects of consumers in the second stage. (5) When consumer identity information can be confirmed in the market, social comparison effects, similar to temporal comparison effects, could help the enterprise increase its price and profit while maintaining product quality. These social and temporal comparison effects constrain consumers. Thus, the number of people who continue to buy products does not decrease.

Comparing the Equilibrium Quality between Cournot and Bertrand Competition

Comparison of Bertrand and Cournot Competitions under Random Yield

Cournot and Bertrand equilibria compared: substitutability, complementarity and concavity

A Comparative Study of the Three Games under Heterogeneous Products Markets

Effects of online reviews and competition on quality and pricing strategies

A Quality - Price Competition Between Manufacturers Based On Showroom

Quality Improvement Through Contract Design and Competition in Agricultural Suppply Chains

On comparing the profitability of horizontal mergers under Cournot and Bertrand competitions

Influence of Online Reviews on the Dynamics of Product Quality and Pricing in a Competitive Market

ANALYSIS OF COURNOT EQUILIBRIUM IN ELECTRICITY MARKET

Production Quality and Pricing Strategy for Substitutable Products under Comparison Effects

Quality di ¤ erentiation and rm choice between online and physical markets

One Way Spillovers Effect in a Vertical Differentiation Market Under the Cournot and Bertrand Duopoly

Study of the horizontal competition of dual-channel retailer and traditional retailer with congestion negative effect of physical channel

Endogenous Timing In A Vertically Differentiated Mixed Duopoly With Cournot Competition

Comparing competition equilibrium with nash equilibrium in electric power market

Dynamic Cournot Model Based on Product Differentiation

Stability of equilibrium price-production of dynamic duopoly Bertrand–Cournot game in a transnational supply chain with asymmetric information

Dual-channel competition: the role of quality improvement and price-matching

Models on the Game of Oligarch Manufacturers

A Note on Cournot Competition in Differentiated Oligopolies