Abstract:1.IntroductionThe corporate board serves the most important role in corporate governance. Exploring factors influencing board structure are fundamental in understanding the role of board directors in improving corporate governance. Previous studies suggested that a corporate board is constituted jointly by reconciling two conflicting views (Boone et al., 2007). One is the efficient board hypothesis that board structure is efficient and there is no need to regulate. The other is the inefficient board hypothesis, which argues that a corporate board is naturally structured inefficiently. Firms should adjust board structure according to the cost and benefit of board monitoring and firm-specific characteristics in order to achieve the optimal board structure. Based on these two competing views, previous studies were of the view that in most cases, the corporate board structure is jointly determined by the scope of operation hypothesis, monitoring hypothesis and bargaining hypothesis (Hermalin and Weisbach, 2001; Arthur, 2001; Iwasaki, 2008; Combs et al., 2007; Lehn et cd., 2009).Studies of this topic on the developing economies are few. This is certainly the case for China, with some studies of Chinese board governance covering only the initial stages of Chinese economic transition (Chen and Al-Najjar, 2012). Recently, however, Chen's (2014) study on Taiwan, Germain et al.'s (2014) study on Malaysia and Iwasaki's (2008) study on Russia have begun to shed light on the developing and transforming countries with institutional settings and characteristics that differ from those in advanced economies. This study makes comparisons with existing studies by addressing particular issues related to Chinese board structure during the period from 2000 to 2012.This study focuses on China because its corporate sector has grown to include some of the largest firms in the world,1 and the country has been undergoing economic transition during the last three decades. Chinese economic transition is a gradual process and follows the path of partial privatization of state enterprises. The largest enterprises are also increasingly seeking listing in China's and foreign stock exchanges. While, Chinese listed firms are divided into state and private enterprises, there are also firms for which ownership is unclear (Cheong et al., 2014). However, because this ownership ambiguity is hard to clarify, this paper has to rely on the official definitions of state-controlled and private-controlled enterprises. Still, China's split-share structure reform in 2005 that converted non-tradable shares into tradable shares has moved Chinese corporate governance closer to that characterized by market-orientation. In addition, agency theory-based government regulations towards hiring independent directors is another driving force for listed firms to adjust their board structure.The structure of this paper is as follows. Section 2 reviews the literature on the determinants of board structure. Section 3 examines China's corporate governance issues, including the split-share structure reform and enterprises. Section 4 provides the specification of the research methods and the data used for estimation. Section 5 shows the empirical findings. Section 6 concludes by drawing several implications.2.Literature ReviewThe literature on the determinants of board structure is generally framed by three basic theories, namely the resource dependent theory, agency theory and power circulation theory. The resource dependent theory argues that the main function of the corporate board is to give advice and information needed to facilitate the firm's decision-making and strategic choice (Hillman and Dalziel, 2003; Pugliese et al., 2014). From the agency theory's perspective, however, the corporate board functions to monitor the interaction between managers as the agent and shareholders as the principal, and on behalf of the latter (Fama and Jensen, 1983; Shleifer and Vishny, 1997; Hillman and Dalziel, 2003). …

Deputation Theory Review

Beyond deployment of resource--Why entrepreneurial theory of the firm is better than the traditional ones

Delegation Structure and Incentives:The Case of Multiple Agents

On Strategic Delegation Equilibrium In Duopoly Market

Specific Information and Delegation

Study of Dynamic Modeling on the Effective Decision Right Allocation within Firms:Analysis Based on Behavioral Perspective

A new approach for fair efficiency decomposition in two-stage structure system

Effort allocation and governance effect of multiple-board independent directors: evidence from reputation and geographic proximity

Debt of Bank, Institutional Environment and the Agent Cost of Controlling Shareholder

Review on Foreign Research about Top Executive Compensation——From the Perspective of Multiple Theories

Effective Corporate Board Structure and Agency Problems: Evidence from China's Economic Transition

Interests versus Culture in the Theory of Institutional Change?

Independent Directors:A Part of Agency Problem

Governing Adaptation and Coordination: A Generalization of Multi-agent Delegation

Optimal Assignment of Principalship in Teams

Toward a Theory of Internal Governance Structure of China’s Large SOEs

Study on Dual-core Theory Solving the 2nd Type Agency Problem

Comparatives of Incentive Efficiency of Common Agency and Exclusive Dealing

Could Executive Compensation Incentive Enhance the Efficiency of Enterprise Resource Allocation? An Empirical Study from China

Stewardship Theory or Agency Theory: CEO Governance and Shareholder Returns

Independent Directors: One Head, Two Hats - A Mismatch between Delaware Corporate Law and Federal Securities Law