Abstract:Purpose This paper aims to draw on the network perspective of organizational innovation to present an argument on how a subsidiary should select innovation behavior. Design/methodology/approach In this framework, the paper analyzes middle- and high-level managers of subsidiaries from various industries located in the Chinese Mainland. Findings The results suggest the following ideas: internal embeddedness is positively related to exploitation innovation, external embeddedness is inverted-U related to exploration innovation, the availability of alternatives positively moderates the main effects, whereas restraint in the use of power negatively moderates them. Research limitations/implications The current study has a few limitations that provide meaningful research directions for future investigations. First, it only considers the industry and ownership as control variables. Second, this study was conducted in the Chinese context. Practical implications The analysis of the relationship between embeddedness and innovation behavior also shows that focal subsidiary must dynamically adjust the way of embeddedness on the basis of its strategy, and it can reasonable leverage strategic assets for exploitation innovation or exploration innovation. From the perspective of headquarters, establishing deep embeddedness with a subsidiary and giving it indispensable support are important to promote that subsidiary's exploitation innovation. Social implications The focal subsidiary should establish relationships with more alternative partners and develop relationships with power-advantaged partners through strategies such as a long-term contract, establishing an R&D alliance and entering a joint venture. Besides this, more powerful partners in the internal network should adopt various power usage strategies to promote focal subsidiary exploitation innovation and more powerful partners in the external network should show restraint in the use of power toward any subsidiary in an over-embedded situation. The result shows environment dynamism affects subsidiary exploration innovation more deeply than exploitation innovation. Consequently, managers should recognize the importance of dynamic adaptation to environmental changes and adjust their firms' innovation behavior accordingly, especially when they are implementing an exploration innovation strategy. Originality/value The extent of embeddedness in an innovation network shapes the subsidiary innovation behavior, and this effect is moderated by power. The focal subsidiary should dynamically and strategically adjust its innovation behavior considering various its type and level of embeddedness.

Does Dual Network Embeddedness Have Different Influence on Subsid-iary Development Competence? Based on Empirical Study of Chinese Subsidiaries of MNCs

Relational Embeddedness in Home Country Networks and Multinational Dynamic Capabilities:Evidence from Chinese Firms

Relational Embeddedness in Home-Based Network and Dynamic Capabilities: Evidence from Chinese MNCs

Headquarters-Subsidiary Relationship and Foreign Subsidiary Innovation in Emerging Multinationals: A Loose Coupling Perspective

The Evolution of Innovation Capability in Multinational Enterprise Subsidiaries: Dual Network Embeddedness and the Divergence of Subsidiary Specialisation in Taiwan

Network Structure of Host Country,Locational Embeddedness and Network Learning of Overseas Subsidiaries:An Empirical Study based on 123 Subsidiaries in China

Analysis on Network Learning Competence's Moderating Effect Between Network Structure and Performance of Network Learning:An Empirical Study Based on 123 Subsidiaries in China

Power and Relational Embeddedness's Impact on Knowledge Inflow: Taking MNC's Subsidiary in China for Example

A Study on the Formation and Development of Subsidiary Special Advantage:A Perspective of Resources

Exploitation versus exploration: The impact of network embeddedness on the innovation of subsidiary firms

Does Learning at Home and from Abroad Boost the Foreign Subsidiary Performance of Emerging Economy Multinational Enterprises?

Enhancing subsidiary innovation capability through customer involvement in new product development: A contingent knowledge source perspective

The Complementarity between Network Cohesion and Structural Holes: Exploration at Subsidiary-Level

Cultural distance and subsidiary roles in knowledge transfer in MNCs in China

How do emerging multinationals achieve sustainable development globally? The enabling mechanism of headquarter‐subsidiary structure in subsidiary sustainability

What Factors Determine the Subsidiary Mode of Overseas R&D by Developing‐country MNEs? Empirical Evidence from Chinese Subsidiaries Abroad

Untangling the Commonalities and Differences Between Domestic Cross-Regional Experience and International Experience in Shaping Speed of Internationalization

Network Structures of Overseas Subsidiaries in Host Countries and the Performance of Network Learning:Are the Network Learning Mode moderators

Dual Capabilities and Organizational Learning in New Product Market Performance

Subsidiary staffing strategy and innovation performance in Chinese multinational enterprises: the moderating effect of institutional distance

Exploitation Versus Exploration