Abstract:Purpose The purpose of this paper is to analyze the effect of the reputation of underwriters and sponsoring representatives on initial public offering (IPO) underwriting fees, and further investigates the role of ownership and political connection. Design/methodology/approach The methodology includes three models. Model 1 empirically investigates the effect of underwriter’s reputation on underwriting fee. Model 2 studies the effect of sponsoring representative’s reputation on underwriting fee. Model 3 further examines the effect of underwriter’s reputation and sponsoring representative reputation on the underwriting fee controlling for the impact of ultimate controlling ownership and political connection. Findings The study documents that underwriters’ and sponsoring representatives’ reputation can result in reputational premiums. In the IPO of state-owned enterprises (SOEs), the reputation of underwriters and sponsoring representatives does not significantly affect the underwriting fees. In the IPO of non-state-owned enterprises (NSOEs), there is a significantly positive correlation between underwriters’ and sponsoring representatives’ reputation and underwriting fees. Further research results show that, on the one hand, the effect of underwriters’ and sponsoring representatives’ reputation on underwriting fees is not significant in the IPO of NSOEs with political connection. On the other hand, underwriting fees are positively associated with underwriters’ and sponsoring representatives’ reputation in the IPO of NSOEs without political connection. Research limitations/implications The sponsoring representative’s fee is not disclosed separately, which makes it difficult to distinguish the incremental effect from underwriter’s services and reputation. Practical implications NSOEs relative to SOEs are more likely to pay higher underwriting fees for hiring underwriter and sponsoring representative with better reputation during the process of IPO. Social implications The reputation of underwriter and sponsoring representative does not matter to SOEs but does matter to NSOEs. However, NSOEs’ political connection affects underwriter fees. Originality/value This paper provides new evidence of sponsoring representatives’ reputation and political connection on the underwriting fees in the IPO in Chinese SOEs and NSOEs.

Empirical Research on the Effect of Sponsoring Broker's Reputation on Information Quality of Firms from "New Three Board"

Financing, reputation and information disclosure quality in the Chinese market

The Empirical Study on Disclosure Quality of Listed Companies in China

Reputation of Investment Banker and Quality of Issuing Company——Empirical Research from Capital Market of China

Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting and Accounting Information Quality an Empirical Study on Listed Companies in Shenzhen

Replacement of Sponsor Representatives during Consistent Supervision Period and Information Disclosure of Listed Companies

Empirical Analysis of Controlling Shareholder's Influence on Transparency of Corporate Information Disclosure: Evidence from Listed Companies in Shenzhen Stock Exchange Markets

Reputation Effect of Investment Banks:Research from Aspects of Market Share and Service Quality

Peer effects of corporate product quality information disclosure: Learning and competition

Research on Information Disclosure Quality of Corporate Social Responsibility from Corporate Governance Perspective

Exterior Supervision,Regulation Environment and Information Disclosure Quality

The Impact of the Reputation of Underwriter and Sponsoring Representative on IPO Underwriting Fees

Bank shareholder network and board governance: Evidence from Chinese commercial banks

The Mechanism and Empirical Research of Directors' Status Differences, Behavior Strength of Decision-Making and Financial Performance of Private Listed Companies

Heterogeneous Action of Institutional Investors Improving the Quality of Information Disclosure

Influence Mechanism between Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Sustainability: Empirical Evidence from China

Study on the Impact of the Second Board on the Main Board:Evidence and Enlightenment from Hongkong Stock Market and Shenzhen Small-and-medium Enterprise Board Market

An Empirical Study of Regulation Efficiency of New participant in Chinese Capital Market

Secretary of Board of Directors and Corporate Internal Information: Evidence from Chinese Stock Market

Peer Effect in Corporate Environmental Information Disclosure: Evidence from Listed Firms in China

Information interactions on social media platforms and the quality of corporate social responsibility disclosure: Evidence from Chinese listed firms