Safety Stressors and Coal Miners' Safety Performance: The Mediating Role of Resilience and Coping Styles
Hongxia Li,Yiru Zhang,Wanli Yang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/prbm.s436598
IF: 3.974
2024-01-07
Psychology Research and Behavior Management
Abstract:Hongxia Li, 1, &ast Yiru Zhang, 2, &ast Wanli Yang 3 1 College of Management, Xi'an University of Science and Technology, Xi'an, 710054, People's Republic of China; 2 College of Energy Engineering, Xi'an University of Science and Technology, Xi'an, 710054, People's Republic of China; 3 Shaanxi Xixian Financial Holdings Group Co., Ltd, Xianyang, 712000, People's Republic of China &astThese authors contributed equally to this work Correspondence: Yiru Zhang, College of Energy Engineering, Xi'an University of Science and Technology, Xi'an, 710054, People's Republic of China, Email Purpose: This study aimed to investigate the effects of three different safety stressors (safety role ambiguity, safety role conflicts, and safety interpersonal conflicts) on safety performance of coal miners under the mediating role of resilience and coping styles. Patients and Methods: The study is cross-sectional. To collect data to analyze the hypothesized relationships in the present study, a total of 450 questionnaires were distributed to coal miners in Shannxi Province of China. Regression analysis was employed as the main statistical technique in analyzing the data using SPSS 22.0 and Process 4.1. Results: The results of regression analysis indicate that the three kind of safety stressors have a negative predictive effect on coal miners' safety performance. Resilience and coping styles both were the mediating variables between the safety stressors (safety role ambiguity, safety role conflicts, and safety interpersonal conflicts) and coal miners' safety performance, and resilience and coping styles play a chain mediating role between the safety stressors (safety role ambiguity, safety role conflicts, and safety interpersonal conflicts) and safety performance of coal miners. Conclusion: This study further explores the mechanism between safety stressors and safety performance, providing theoretical guidance for improving the safety performance of coal mines. It emphasizes the importance of coal miner's resilience intervention, positive coping styles promotion, and negative coping styles prevention in coal mine safety production. Keywords: safety performance, resilience, safety stressors, coping styles In China, underground coal mining is considered one of the most dangerous jobs. 1 Even with the continuous improvement of mining safety production in China in 2021, a total of 356 accidents occurred in coal mines nationwide, resulting in 503 deaths and a mortality rate of 0.044 per million tons. 2 However, from 2005 to 2014, the average annual mortality rate in the United States was as low as 0.0208 per million tons. 3 There is still a significant gap between China and developed countries in terms of the safety of coal mine production. We need to ensure workplace safety to reduce the personal damage and property loss caused by the coal mine accident. 4 Safety performance has always been a hot topic of research because it can improve workplace safety. 5–9 Environmental pollution in soil, 10 food, 11–34 water resources, 35 air, 36–38 is increasing with the industrialization of countries 39–54 and may reduce workplace safety. These pollutants including mycotoxins, 47,55–59 radioactive elements, 60 microbial, 61–63 heavy metals, 64–72 hormones, 73 pesticides, 74–76 antibiotics 77,78 caused various diseases. 79,80 The definition of safety performance has always lacked consistency in the academic field. 5 Some scholars believe that safety performance may refers to an organizational metric for safety outcomes, such as accident rate, injury rate, mortality rate, etc. 81 However, this definition cannot provide advance warning for safety accidents, so scholars generally believe that safety performance may refers to a metric for safety-related behaviors of individuals. 82 This definition provides researchers with measurable indicators, 4 and the more widely used method is to evaluate employees' safety compliance (SC) and safety participation (SP), which is a more scientific way to measure safety performance. 83 SC refers to the core safety activities that individuals must undertake to maintain workplace safety, and SP refers to behaviors such as participating in voluntary safety activities or attending safety meetings. 84 This article will adopt this definition. It is worth mentioning that safety performance belongs to a separate field of work performance, and the difference between the two is about their task, contextual -Abstract Truncated-
psychology, clinical, multidisciplinary