Thought Patterns of Some Editors of Academic Journals

Shao Jufang,Shen Huiyun,Zhang Silong,HE Xiaojun
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1087/095315106777877601
2005-01-01
Abstract:ABSTRACT Influenced by Chinese traditional thought, some contemporary editors of Chinese academic journals have holistic and authority‐based thought patterns and values. Editors with such ideas are easily misled in the refereeing of manuscriptss. This leads to some high‐quality manuscripts being turned down and others, of little academic value, being published. The editorial aim of publication of the best material is difficult to realize. If a journal wishes to develop and gain international acceptance, editors with such ideas must adjust and change their thought patterns and values.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?