Abstract:Recent advances in information technology have led to the extensive use of electronic maps in navigation tasks. An important question is how to present information about locations and directions to facilitate navigation tasks performed by different users. Extensive studies in the literature have investigated the effect of the frame of reference (i.e., North-Up and Track-Up Electronic Maps) on navigation performance but found disparate results regarding the best type of maps to optimize performance (Aretz & Wickens, 1992; Cuevas, Huthman, Knudsen, and Wei, 2001). The field dependence-independence (FDI), as one of the cognitive styles, has been found to affect an individual’s way of orienting in virtual environments but not their performance in orienting tasks (Kroutter, 2010). However, few studies have been carried out to research how users’ cognitive styles interacted with map characteristics, which in turn influenced their navigation performance. The current work investigated the effect of individual’s field dependence-independence and map’s frame of reference on user performance in orienting and navigating tasks using 2D electronic maps. The Experiments 1 indicated that field-dependent (FD) individuals showed significantly higher accuracy in orienting tasks when using the track-up maps than when using the north-up maps, whereas field-independent (FI) individuals had no difference when using either type of maps. The current study may imply that FD individuals showed worse performance than field-independent individuals when using north-up maps because an additional step of mental rotation was included when making direction judgments with north-up maps and FD individuals were more likely influenced by the external cues in mental rotations. Since track-up maps matched with the direction of travel, the mental rotation was not necessary, so that FD and FI individuals showed no significant difference in such direction judgment tasks. Experiment 2 examined the effects of field dependence and frame of reference on navigation task performance in the virtual environment. Results showed that FI individuals had better performance than FD individuals regarding the number of map references. The results also showed an interaction effect of field dependence and frame of reference on task completion time. In particular, FI individuals showed a significantly quicker time to complete the navigation task than FD individuals when using north-up maps, whereas they showed no difference in task completion time when using track-up maps. Although track-up maps led to the superior performance for FD individuals, the subjective rating of track-up maps was lower than that of north-up maps. In summary, previous empirical studies have failed to find clear evidence to support either North-up or Track-up designs. The current study proposed one possible implication of such inconsistent findings: that a user’s field dependence/ independence dimension in spatial cognition influences their performance when using different frames of reference. The mental rotation cost using a north-up display can be reduced for field-independent individuals since such users showed better performance in extracting and integrating information to maintain their mental representation of the system. This implication could be further utilized in the user-centered designs of navigation displays by considering individual differences.

Impacts of Field Independence and Field Dependence Cognitive Style on Information Seeking Performance：A Meta-analysis Research

Effects of Display Format of Air Traffic Information on Situation Awareness and Cognitive Performance in Cockpit

The Influence of Time Stress on Search Performance for Information with Different Hypertext Structures

Effect of cognitive style on time-based prospective memory

Research on the Integration of Cognitive Style with Information Seeking Behavior

Individual Inferences in Web-Based Information Environments: How Cognitive Processing Fluency, Information Access, Active Search Behaviors, and Task Competency Affect Metacognitive and Task Judgments

Effects of Cognitive Style and Information Acquisition Method on Diagnosis Task Performance

Effects of Hypertext Navigation Route and Cognitive Styles on Performance of Information Search on WWW

The Correlation of Field Cognitive Style and Working Memory Capacity with English Reading Strategy of Second Language Learners

Effect of Individual Thinking Styles on Item Selection During Study Time Allocation

Individual Differences in Orienting and Navigating Tasks when Using North-Up and Track-Up Electronic Maps

Effect of metacognitive strategies and verbal-imagery cognitive style on biology-based video search and learning performance

THE INHIBITORY MECHANISM OF DEPENDENT-INDEPENDENT COGNITIVE STYLES

Unravelling the Influence of Cognitive Style on Chinese Students’ Classroom Behaviours: the Mediating Effects of the Structure-Oriented/depth-oriented Learning Approach

Differences in time-based prospective memory between field-independent and field-dependent cognitive styles under different time monitoring conditions

FIELD DEPENDENT–INDEPENDENT COGNITIVE STYLE AND CREATIVITY FROM THE PROCESS AND PRODUCT-ORIENTED APPROACHES: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW

Field Dependence / Field Independence as a Factor of Financial Decision Making With Varying Degrees of Risk Among Students

Information representation in decision making: The impact of cognitive style and depletion effects

The interplay between internet searching styles and academic self-efficacy: a longitudinal study

Towards Adaptive Information Visualization - A Study of Information Visualization Aids and the Role of User Cognitive Style

Does school-related Internet Information seeking improve academic self-efficacy? The moderating role of internet information seeking styles