Abstract:Academic journal is an important medium of research publication and academic exchange.The academic journal evaluation system in China has been initially established,but quality and innovativeness evaluations are still weak.There are profound socio-economic,cultural,administrative reasons for this problem,which have caused negative impact on the value orientation of scholars and their research behavior,affected the objectivity and impartiality of academic evaluation,and undermined the cleanness and pureness of the academia. Scholars of the humanities and social sciences and library and information science experts have already reached a consensus that academic evaluation in the humanities and social sciences should be more diverse,localized and content-based,and there should be quality and innovativeness evaluations.In the past dozen years,academic journal evaluation is mainly quantitative and formal,but now more emphasis should be placed on content evaluation and innovativeness evaluation to create a fair and free environment for academic journal evaluation. On the premise of maintaining the reasonable elements in the existing academic journal evaluation system,this article proposes a combination of three new concepts including formal evaluation,content evaluation and effectiveness evaluation,and puts forward a new evaluation method integrating peer-review and bibliometric evaluation.The proposed combination of the three new concepts would be able to explain the history and the current situation of journal evaluation,and also predict its future.The aim of the new thinking and the approach to realize it is to overcome the institutional obstacles that hinder the healthy development of academic evaluation,to establish a fair and rational academic environment for scholars,and to create an open and constructive academic environment in the future.

Quality Assessment Systems and Promotion Strategies for Scientific and Technical Reports in China

Study on Management System to Reduce Atmospheric Emissions Based on Environmental Quality

On the Medical Servlce Model Highlighting Quality of Care and Patient Safety

A Study of the Quality Assessment of Online Sci-tech Research Papers

International Performance of Chinese Institutes in Different Disciplines——A Bibliometric View

Solutions to improve the quality of acceptance assessment of medical scientific project in China

An Analysis of the International Academic Influence of Academic Journals in China over the Three Decades Since Reform and Opening Up

Promotion of Science and Technology by Using Network Literatures——An Investigation of Science & Technology Literature Utilization on Internet in China

High Quality Papers and the Development of China's "Double First-class" Construction Universities

Legislation Strategy Research on Scientific and Technical Resources Sharing

The Review and Outlook for Scientific and Technological Information Undertaking of China

A retrospective analysis of China's science and technology evaluation policy since 1978

Analysis and Reflection on S&T Papers of Tsinghua University Published in Recent Years

Study of Evaluation on Science & Technology Resources and Allocation

The science, technology and innovation policy studies in China: A scientometric analysis

Several Problems in Assessing Quality of Biomedical Papers

National Essential Public Health Services Programs over the Past Decade Research Report Three：Challenges and Recommendations of Implementation National Essential Public Health Services Programs over the Past Decade

To Improve the Research Assessment Process in China

Evidence Based Social Science in China Paper 4 : The quality of social science systematic reviews and meta-analysis published from 2000-2019

Quality and Innovativeness in the Evaluation of Academic Journals

Following the international publishing rules and trends, and abiding by China's regulations related to publishing: review of the second ISMTE Asian-Pacific conference (Ⅰ)