Abstract:Based on publications indexed in the Web of Science, the current study focused on internationally collaborated publications and publications acknowledging government funding of developing and developed countries including China, the US, Germany, the Netherlands, South Africa, and Brazil. Specific focus is placed on national funding agencies (i.e., focal agencies) supporting competitive research in science. The focal agencies of the six countries include the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC), the US National Science Foundation (NSF), German Research Foundation, the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO), National Research Foundation of South Africa (NRF), and National Council for Scientific and Technological Development of Brazil (CNPq). Results show that different countries vary in arrangement of government funding sources in support of competitive research projects. China and Brazil are centralized to the NSFC and CNPq, whereas the remaining four countries have relatively decentralized sources. The six focal national funding agencies of the current study are more efficient than non-focal agencies in raising citation impact, with the NWO, NSF, and NSFC perform better than non-focal agencies of corresponding countries. International collaboration improves citation impact, with the developing countries benefit more. Authorship (first or corresponding authorship) also plays a role in international collaboration. Collaboration led by authors from developed countries has a positive effect whereas that led by authors from developing countries usually have negative effects on citation impact. Interaction between funding and collaboration may have results different from those when these two factors are considered separately, which suggests being cautious while discussing effects of either of the two factors.

Scientific Research Cooperation Effect on the Quality of Output Papers——Taking East China University of Science and Technology as An Example

A Study of Effects of Supply Chain Relationship Capital on Cooperation Performance under Global Sourcing Circumstances

Leadership in Cooperation: A Scientometrics Analysis on China's Participation in International Science and Technology Cooperation

Academic publishing and collaboration between China and Germany in physics

International Performance of Chinese Institutes in Different Disciplines——A Bibliometric View

What Can Influence the Quality of International Collaborative Publications: A Case Study of Humanities and Social Sciences International Collaboration in China’s Double First-Class Project Universities

Relation Between Cooperation of Authors and Influence Power of Papers in Different Medical Subjects in China

Analysis of Influence Factors on the Quality of International Collaboration Research in the Field of Social Sciences and Humanities: The Case of Chinese World Class Universities (2015–2019)

Comparison of universities' scientific performance using bibliometric indicators

In-depth analysis on China’s international cooperation in science

Characteristics of Research in China Assessed with Essential Science Indicators

The Effect Of Co-Authorship Network On Research Performance Of Scholars: A Correlation Analysis

The Output of Academic Papers in University as Seen from the Three Retrieval System——Taking Shandong University of Science and Technology as an Example

A Comparative Study of Domestic and Cross‐country Impact of Chinese and U.S. Publications in Chemistry

Comparative Study on Output Performance of Major Public Funds in Terms of Chinese-language Publications

An Analysis on China-US Cooperation in Science and Technology from the Perspective of China-US Co-authored Papers' Status

A Bilateral Comparison of Research Performance at an Institutional Level

High Quality Papers and the Development of China's "Double First-class" Construction Universities

An In-Depth Analysis of Government Funding and International Collaboration in Scientific Research

The Correlation Between Scientific Collaboration and Citation Count at the Paper Level: a Meta-Analysis

A Case Study of Nanjing University:The Influence of Introducing SCI into Assessment System on the Quality of Basic Research in Mainland Chinese Universities