Exploring Science Funding Cultures:Ethnomethodology behind the Institutional Talks

Chengwei WANG
2017-01-01
Abstract:Both policy and academic audiences find enormous difficulties in defining, understanding or even perceiving the so-called 'science funding cultures'. Existing research focused primarily on the 'ought to be' issues at the same time, couldn't help but increase the risks of 'formulation politics'. The 'to be' cultures were explored accordingly via the natural breaching experiments caused by the 'science funding cultures' essay activities as a result, basing on a careful review to the methodologies that were historically employed to study the science related cultures, where a simply 'follow the actors' strate-gy was applied. It is found that, the fundamental rule to constitute the 'science funding cultures' is to historically break from the departmentalism as well as equalitarianism. What the cultures 'are not' accordingly, the creeds of not being a wel-fare for some working units(Danwei), not being certain pure 'blue sky' research, and not being a government bureaucracy for example, would play a more important role than what the cultures 'are'.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?