The Fourth Discussion on Bad Theory of Education:The Theoretical Character of Pedagogy

Kaicheng Yang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1009-5195.2014.04.004
2014-01-01
Abstract:Although pedagogy has its own historical rationality and academic contribution, its theoretical character is bad. Actually pedagogy is metaphysics. Based on transcendental concepts, pedagogy constructs an educational utopia which is weak and an exclusive theoretical shell filled with many pseudo-problems. Such pedagogy is not a discipline, but a career guide for educators. If pedagogy can be called a theory, it can be a bad theory because it can't help educators not only implement effective educational actions, but also understand those actions. The pedagogy which considers advocacies, so-called principles, methods and models for education as its core contents is only subjective recommendations of individuals and a private"theory"which has not been justified by inter-subjective rationality as a real theory. It is proper that pedagogy is considered as educational wisdom or arts, because pedagogy exhibits low level of theory, but high level of practice. A discipline is the originality of knowledge. The real question for educational discipline is that what knowledge it has created or can create. Pedagogy is not a discipline since it has no innovative knowledge, so the discipline system built for pedagogy is just a castle in the air.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?