Reconsidering Master’sTrainingOrientation:DebateandPossibility

WANGChuan-yi,Yu-qi WANG,YangJia-le
DOI: https://doi.org/10.14138/j.1001-4519.2019.02.011511
2019-01-01
Abstract:Intheeraofhighereducationpopularization,master’seducationneedstobereconsid-ered.Althoughthereisaclearpolicystatementonthetrainingorientationofmaster’sdegreepro-grams,itisdifficulttodifferentiateitfromdoctoraldegreeprogramsinpractice.Fromtheperspective ofhistoricaldevelopment,therearetwomajorproblemsconcerningtheorientationofmaster’seduca-tionthatattractattentionfromallwalksoflife.Firstly,shouldthemaster'sdegreebeconsideredasa transitionaldegreeorafinaldegree? Secondly,shouldthestandardsofmaster'squalitybediversifiedor unitary? Basedontheanalysisofdataonemploymentoutcomesandinstitutionaldistributionandrele-vantpolicies,thisstudyputsforwardthatthetrainingorientationofmaster’seducationshouldasfol-low:itisafinaldegreewithtransitionalnature;itcontainsdifferenttypesatthepresetedlevel(post-baccalaureate,pre-doctorate)to meetdiversedemandofeconomicandsocialdevelopment;abasic benchmarkingstandardofqualityshouldbesharedacrossdifferenttypes,whichisthe"maximumcom-mondenominator"betweenacademiaand marketthatcouldsatisfytherequirementsofhigh-leveltal-entscapacityinbothsettings;andbeyondthebenchmark,diversifiedstandardsshouldbeallowedto incorporatespecificinstitutionalfunctionsandprofessionalcharacteristics.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?