Application of Grounded Theory:Misconceptions and Strategies Chinese Full Text
何木叶,刘电芝
DOI: https://doi.org/10.16719/j.cnki.1671-6981.20220531
2022-01-01
Abstract:In recent years, the application of grounded theory in psychology is on the rise, but the misconceptions in its application constrain the quality of research. The purpose of this systematic review is to provide a reference for practical studies through the clarification of common misconceptions in the application of grounded theory and proposals of specific strategies for the difficulties in its use.On the ground of literature analysis, this article dissects the misconceptions about using grounded theory in psychology. The misconceptions discussed here are as follows. Misconception 1: some studies of grounded theory neglect theory generation. The grounded theory method holds the advantage of producing and promoting new theories. The development of localization theory is one of the important paths for the advances of psychology in China, so the application of grounded theory should focus on theoretical pursuits. Misconception 2: many researchers confuse theoretical sampling with purposive or initial sampling. Equating purposive sampling with theoretical sampling confuses the concept of distinct categories.It ignores the uniqueness of the theoretical focus of theoretical sampling, which means they cannot be used as synonymous terms. Theoretical sampling proceeds based on data analysis, but the initial sampling collects initial information. They are not the equivalents. Misconception 3: some researchers equate theoretical saturation with data saturation. There are differences between data saturation and theoretical saturation in purpose,meaning, occurrence stage, and manifestations. On this ground, it cannot be equated with data saturation. Misconception 4: some researchers often downplay memo writing and constant comparison but exaggerate mechanical coding. The mechanical coding disengages from the actual conditions of researching. Memo-writing and constant comparison promote category generation and theory development. It needs to increase attention on flexible coding, memo writing, and constant comparison.Targeting the increased comprehensibility and accessibility of the grounded theory for the Novice, this article analyzes the strategies to apply its core principles through case analysis. These strategies are as follows:（1） Conduct the theoretical sampling through diverse forms such as identification of new locations, and participants characteristics based on key concepts.（2） Judge the theoretical saturation based on conceptual density, logical relationships between categories, and theoretical explanatory power.（3） Facilitate the appropriate coding procedure through compliance with the coding normalization and flexibility, group dialogue.（4） Write the memo with the help of a figure and table. Carry out the constant comparison through similarities and differences, longitudinal and horizontal, back and forth comparison.（5） Take the daily psychology and behavior of Chinese people as the starting point for the construction of grounded theory. Based on the dynamic nature of psychology, emphasize on situational analysis. Based on the complexity of psychology, we utilize multiple perspectives and the diversified analysis path to find the core category. Based on the dynamics of psychology, we should capture the longitudinal clues of theoretical integration.Given the current misconceptions and difficulties in grounded theory study, this article proposes that research on applying grounded theory should focus on systematicity, standardization, and flexibility. In addition, researchers should develop diverse strategies to promote theory generation in the future based on the core principles of grounded theory and research practice.