Abstract:Background: Moral evaluation is identified as the first stage in the theory of moral judgment, and academics believe that it may align with the social intuitionist model. This study aims to prove that the model's emotional dominance hypothesis applies to moral evaluation by presenting a computational decision-making model that mathematically formalizes this emotional dominance decision-making process. We also compared different types of valence evaluation tasks to test the emotional priority hypothesis. Methods: We used a convenience sampling method to randomly recruit 30 enrolled college students. The drift-diffusion model was employed to analyze reaction times for words with various emotional and moral valences Additionally, we designed different valence evaluation tasks based on the response relevance hypothesis and evaluated the processing order through reaction time comparisons. Results: The analysis revealed that the emotional mechanism of immoral evaluation differs from moral evaluation. An increase in emotional valence accelerates the speed of evidence accumulation (v) for moral evaluation (M = 1.21, 0.2% < 0 < 99.8%) but lowers decision caution (a) in immoral evaluation (M = −0.64, 96.1% < 0 < 3.9%). In contrast, moral valence does not have a significant influence on evaluation processes (v, M = −0.28, 72.1% < 0 < 27.9%; a, M = −0.32, 79.3% < 0 < 20.7%). Furthermore, We found no significant difference in reaction times between moral and immoral words in the emotional evaluation task (F(1,29) = 0.55, p = 0.464, partial η2 = 0.02), but a significant difference existed in the moral evaluation task (F(1,29) = 17.99, p < 0.001, partial η2 = 0.38), indicating that the tendency of relatively fast immoral evaluation in emotional evaluation tasks may be caused by emotional priority. Conclusions: Our findings support the intuitive model's emotional dominance hypothesis and introduce a new emotional mechanism into moral evaluation. This study clarifies the distinct emotional processes in moral and immoral evaluations, fills a gap in the research on moral evaluation, and offers insights into human decision-making in moral contexts.

A Brief Analysis of the Influence of Emotional Exrperience on Moral Belief

Psychological Proof of Emotionalist Ethics:Representation of Moral Emotions and Its Influence on Moral Behavior

On Emotional Experience of Morality

A Research on the Relationship between Pupils' Awareness of the Moral Self and Emotion and Its Influencing Factors

The Effect of Unconscious Emotion on Advice Taking

Moral Positive Illusion: Self–other Valuation Difference in Moral Foundation Theory

Elaboration on Smith's Emotionalism Moral Evalution Theory and Its Modern Enlightenment

The Role of Emotion in Moral Judgment: Evidence from Cognitive Neuroscience

Effects of Emotional State on Undergraduates' Moral Judgments

Moral Emotion: A New Perspective on the Relationship Between Morality and Creativity

A Review and Reflection on Moral Psychology in the Post-Kohlberg Age

Moral identity in relation to emotional well-being: a meta-analysis

The Influence of Emotional Words on Character Building Based on Subjective Text

The Impact of the Extraversion-Introversion Personality Traits and Emotions in a Moral Decision-Making Task

The Influence of Emotional State on Empathic Accuracy

Do emotions play an essential role in moral judgments?

Emotion-Driven Moral Evaluation: A Mechanistic Study Based on the Drift-Diffusion Model

A Brief Analysis of the Conception of Moral Identity in Psychology

Neural Evidence for Moral Intuition and the Temporal Dynamics of Interactions Between Emotional Processes and Moral Cognition

The Relationship Between Emotion and Cognition with Moral Self-regulation

The Influence of Emotion on Fairness-Related Decision Making: A Critical Review of Theories and Evidence