Abstract:Mikulincer, M., and Shaver, P. R. (Eds.). (2012). The social psychology of morality: Exploring the causes of good and evil. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. Hardcover. xv 440 pp. $79.95. ISBN. 978-1-4338-1011-4. Mario Mikulincer, Ph.D., is Professor of Psychology and Dean of the New School qfPsychology at the Interdisciplinary Center in Herzliya, Israel. His publications include over 280 scholarly articles, book chapters, and books. Phillip R. Shaver, Ph.D., is Distinguished Professor of Psychology at the University of California, Davis. He has published over 200 scholarly articles, books, and book chapters. "Morality, like art., means drawing a line someplace' Oscar Wilde Although philosophers and theologians endlessly debate what it means to be moral, psychologists have began to explore the psychological bases for moral behavior underlying these debates. Instead of asking: What is morally correct, and how are morals justified? Psychologists ask how people determine what is moral, and how cognitions and emotions influence moral beliefs? Edited by Mario Mikulincer and Phillip R. Shaver, The Social Psychology of Morality provides a grand overview of current research in the field of moral psychology. This book, which is the culmination of an interdisciplinary conference on Personality and Social Psychology, includes the work of 40 authors, mostly psychologists. The book addresses four main areas in moral psychology: basic issues and controversies; motivational and cognitive processes; developmental, personality, and clinical aspects; and conflict and violence. The volume concludes with a synthesis. The authors critique the classical cognitive-rationalistic approach to moral psychology and explore contemporary research in the field by adopting a broader, more holistic approach to moral psychology. The first section, basic issues in moral psychology, includes six chapters. Jesse Graham and Jonathan Haidt address the concept of sacredness from a moral foundations perspective in chapter one. The theory of moral foundations is foundational to the contemporary approach to moral psychology. In his book, The Righteous Mind, Haidt (2012) discusses the moral foundations of care/harm, fairness/cheating, loyalty/betrayal, authority/subversion, and sanctity/degradation. It is this widening of the moral domain which revolutionizes the research in this field. In chapter two, Fiery Cushman and Joshua Greene present a model that explains the possible origins of moral principles. Peter Ditto and Brittany Liu (chapter three) theorize that moral beliefs are primarily the result of affective reactions supported by post hoc justifications. In the fourth chapter, Paul Bloom explores the possibility of an innate, universal morality. David Pizarro and David Tannenbaum examine the effects of character evaluations on moral judgments in chapter five. In the final chapter of this section, Kurt Gray and Daniel Wegner advance the idea of dyadic morality, which states that for an act to have moral value, it must involve two moral beings: an agent and a patient (receiver). The second section of the book focuses on cognitive and motivational issues in moral psychology. In the seventh chapter, Ronnie Janoff-Bulman explores a dual typology of morality represented by a proscriptive vs. a prescriptive moral system. Janoff-Bulman argues that this dual typology could explain the moral emotions of shame and guilt as well as conservative and liberal political orientations. Shahar Ayal and Francesca Gino explore justifications for honest behaviors in the eighth chapter. In the ninth chapter Benoit Monin and Anna Merritt explain moral hypocrisy. In the tenth chapter, Tal Eyal and Nira Liberman discuss psychological distance and morality from the perspective of construal level theory. Haslam, Bastian, Laham, and Loughnan explore the role of humanization in moral judgments and the moral assessment of others in chapter eleven. …

A Review and Reflection on Moral Psychology in the Post-Kohlberg Age

A Critical Review of Chinese Theoretical Research on Moral Education Since 2000

A Brief Analysis of the Conception of Moral Identity in Psychology

Contemporary Moral Assessment:Reflections from Post structuralism

Review Of Research On Moral Intuition And Moral Reasoning

Critical Review on Psychological Studies on Moral Hypocrisy

Dilemma of Moral Dilemmas:The Conflict Between Emotion and Reasoning in Moral Judgments

Advances in Cognitive Neuroscience of Moral Judgment and Enlightenment to Moral Education in Schools

On the Critical Period of Chinese Pupils' Moral Development: Retrospect and Prospect

Guilt from the Perspective of Morality: an Intergrated Review

On the Moral Psychology Issues in Kant's Ethnics

Thoughts on the Psychology of Moral Education in Chinese Primary and Secondary Schools

A Critique of Pan-Moralization:Putting Morality in Its Right Place

Contemporary Moral Psychology: Exploring Intrapersonal and Interpersonal Factors Linked to Moral Decisions

Psychological Proof of Emotionalist Ethics:Representation of Moral Emotions and Its Influence on Moral Behavior

Neurophysiological Mechanisms of Moral Judgment

Enlightenment of Kohlberg’s Theory of Moral Development in the Context of Moral Education in Mainland China

A Review on Cognition-Emotion Processing Models of Moral Decision-Making

Is Morality Hardwired into the Brain? the Recent Advances and Prospects of Cognitive Neural Mechanism Researches of Morality

Moral Development in Business Ethics: An Examination and Critique

Moral development at the crossroads: New trends and possible futures.