Abstract:The damage caused by soil liquefaction during earthquakes is substantially affected by the total volume and spatial distribution of the liquefied soils. Therefore, a proper characterization of the spatial distribution of liquefaction potential of subsurface soils plays a critical role in earthquake hazard assessment and mitigation. In engineering practice, in situ tests, such as the cone penetration test (CPT), are widely used for evaluating soil liquefaction potential through, e.g., factor of safety (FS) against liquefaction, and the results of liquefaction assessment in a cross-section are needed for subsequent earthquake hazard analysis and mitigation. Traditional simplified methods only provide the liquefaction potential of soils at individual locations, and the results of liquefaction triggering evaluation at individual locations are often used to represent the whole site. This might lead to an unconservative estimation of earthquake-induced deformations and damage at a site where spatial variation of soil properties is significant. In addition, although CPT provides almost continuous sounding along vertical direction, measurements along horizontal directions are usually limited. This leads to the difficulty in proper application of geostatistical methods in liquefaction potential analysis. To address these challenges, a nonparametric and data-driven method is developed in this study to interpret a cross-section of FS with high spatial resolution directly from sparse CPT soundings. Based on the interpreted cross-section of FS, the predicted total volume and spatial distribution of liquefied soils are estimated. Both simulated and real CPT data are used to demonstrate and validate the proposed method, and the results show that the proposed method performs reasonably well.

Liquefaction assessment using standard penetration test valuebased on CPTU soil behavior type index

Characterizing the Liquefaction Potential and Pore Pressure Generation of Silty Sands Through the Energy-Based Approach in the Framework of Critical State Soil Mechanics

A New Index for Evaluating Liquefaction Resistance of Soil under Combined Cyclic Shear Stresses

A New Parameter to Evaluate Liquefaction Resistance of Saturated Sand under Complex Dynamic Stress Paths

Liquefiable Ground Treatment Using Cruciform Section Probe Resonant Compaction Method: A Case Study in the Xitong Expressway, Eastern China

Delineating the Spatial Distribution of Soil Liquefaction Potential in a Cross-Section from Limited Cone Penetration Tests

Experimental Study Of Correlation Of Dynamic Compaction For Foundation Backfilled With Crushed Stone

Liquefaction resistance and small strain stiffness of silty sand: Effects of host sand gradation and fines content

Numerical analysis on the performance of a cushioned foundation with a mixture of both rigid and flexible piles

A Novel Method for Estimating the Undrained Shear Strength of Marine Soil Based on CPTU Tests

Applicability of soil‐type index for shear wave velocity‐based liquefaction assessment

A New Empirical Model for the Undrained Shear Strength of Undisturbed Marine Fine-Grained Soil Based on Piezocone Penetration Tests

Evaluation of SPT-Based Liquefaction Assessment Methods in China

Liquefaction Evaluation by Means of Shear Wave Velocity Method Based on Cyclic Triaxial Tests

A Binary Packing Material–Based Procedure for Evaluating Soil Liquefaction Triggering during Earthquakes

Seismic response comparison and sensitivity analysis of pile foundation in liquefiable and non-liquefiable soils

Comprehensive evaluation of liquefaction potential for sandy soil of the highway bridge on Yangtze river site under ground surface 15m to 30m

Calibration of a CRR model based on an expanded SPT-based database for assessing soil liquefaction potential

A Modified M-Value Method of Bridge Pile Foundation in Liquefiable Ground

A relation between undrained CPTu results and the state parameter for liquefiable soils

Adaptive Sampling Strategy for Characterizing Spatial Distribution of Soil Liquefaction Potential Using Cone Penetration Test