Abstract:This paper adopts minutely high-frequency data of yields,volumes and open interests of the six commodities futures in three exchanges of China to probe into their intraday change patterns,and discovers the `L' pattern intraday movement of absolute yield and volume.We exert financial market microstructure theory,traders' psychology and trading mechanism to explain the different intraday phenomenon between the futures market and the stock market,which has a distinctive `U' pattern.Basing on this,by the help of Granger causality test theories and Vector Autoregressive models(VAR),we study the factors that influence the volatility of yields and the lagged orders.The results show that there are two-way Granger causality among each two of the absolute yield,volume and open interest, which is different from the empirical result of the stock market that there is a one-way Granger causality from volume to absolute yield,and the difference comes from the short mechanism of futures market.Through the decomposition of variance of VAR models and the impulse response analysis,we empirically analyze the dynamic relationship among the three factors.The conclusion shows that: when we treat the volatility of absolute yield as an explained variable,the residual disturbance can be explained about 90% by its lagged terms,and volume can explain about 10%.When volume is interpreted as an explained variable,about 80% of the residual disturbance can be explained by its lagged terms and the volatility of the absolute price explains about 20%.When open interest is considered as an explained variable,lagged terms of its own interprets about 45% to 70% of the residual disturbance,the volume explains 25%-45%,and the volatility of absolute price explains 5% to 10%.All the explanatory variables reach stable about 20-30 minutes later.Empirical result tells the weak impact from open interest to volatility of absolute yield and volume and the strong correlation between volatility of absolute yield and volume.Some investment suggestions are offered from the analysis mentioned above.

Volatility Projection for Agricultural Commodity Futures under Structural Breaks

Volatility Forecasting: the Role of Lunch-Break Returns, Overnight Returns, Trading Volume and Leverage Effects

The role of sudden variance shifts in predicting volatility in bioenergy crop markets under structural breaks

Prediction of Volatility Based on Realized-Garch-kernel-type Models: Evidence from China and the U.S.

Volatility of Chinese futures market based on ACD model

Volatility and Correlation Prediction of High Frequency Agricultural Futures:Based on Realized Copula-DCC Model

ON MULTIPLE STRUCTURAL BREAKS IN DISTRIBUTION: AN EMPIRICAL CHARACTERISTIC FUNCTION APPROACH

Implied volatility surface predictability: The case of commodity markets

Forecasting the realized volatility of agricultural commodity prices: Does sentiment matter?

Modeling Value at Risk of agricultural commodity while accounting for seasonality and weather using Extreme Value Theory

Intraday Effects Analysis of Chinese Futures Markets

A CEEMD-ARIMA-SVM model with structural breaks to forecast the crude oil prices linked with extreme events

Financial Volatility Forecasting with Range-Based Autoregressive Volatility Model

Tail risk forecasting and its application to margin requirements in the commodity futures market

Investor Structure and Corn Futures Price Volatility in China: Evidence Based on the Agent-Based Model

Asymmetric Information and Volatility Forecasting in Commodity Futures Markets

Seasonal Stochastic Volatility and the Samuelson Effect in Agricultural Futures Markets

Grain prices, oil prices, and multiple smooth breaks in a VAR

Crossproduct Effect and Volatility Forecasting

Forecasting Volatility of Energy Commodities: Comparison of GARCH Models with Support Vector Regression

Functional volatility forecasting