Abstract:<section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Purpose</h3><p>UTE sequences typically acquire data during the ramping up of the gradient fields, which makes UTE imaging prone to eddy current and system delay effects. The purpose of this work was to use a simple gradient impulse response function (GIRF) measurement to estimate the real readout gradient waveform and to demonstrate that precise knowledge of the gradient waveform is important in the context of high‐resolution UTE musculoskeletal imaging.</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Methods</h3><p>The GIRF was measured using the standard hardware of a 3 Tesla scanner and applied on 3D radial UTE data (TE: 0.14 ms). Experiments were performed on a phantom, in vivo on a healthy knee, and in vivo on patients with spine fractures. UTE images were reconstructed twice, first using the GIRF‐corrected gradient waveforms and second using nominal‐corrected waveforms, correcting for the low‐pass filter characteristic of the gradient chain.</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Results</h3><p>Images reconstructed with the nominal‐corrected gradient waveforms exhibited blurring and showed edge artifacts. The blurring and the edge artifacts were reduced when the GIRF‐corrected gradient waveforms were used, as shown in single‐UTE phantom scans and in vivo dual‐UTE gradient‐echo scans in the knee. Further, the importance of the GIRF‐based correction was indicated in UTE images of the lumbar spine, where thin bone structures disappeared when the nominal correction was employed.</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Conclusion</h3><p>The presented GIRF‐based trajectory correction method using standard scanner hardware can improve the quality of high‐resolution UTE musculoskeletal imaging.</p></section>

Correction Ofk-Space Trajectory Errors in Ultra-Short TE Imaging

Pulse Stretching Correction for Improving Ultrasound Image Resolution

Accuracy of UTE-MRI-based patient setup for brain cancer radiation therapy.

Strategies to Improve Intratrain Prospective Motion Correction for Turbo Spin‐echo Sequences with Constant Flip Angles

Trajectory correction based on the gradient impulse response function improves high‐resolution UTE imaging of the musculoskeletal system

Ultrashort echo time and zero echo time MR imaging and their applications at high magnetic fields: A literature survey

Ultra-short time-echo based ray tracing for transcranial focused ultrasound aberration correction in human calvaria

Ultra‐short T2 components imaging of the whole brain using 3D dual‐echo UTE MRI with rosette k‐space pattern

A general algorithm for compensation of trajectory errors: Application to radial imaging

Evaluation of Trajectory Error Effects in BP Based Space Target ISAR Imaging

Towards assessing and improving the reliability of ultrashort echo time quantitative magnetization transfer (UTE-qMT) MRI of cortical bone: In silico and ex vivo study

Reference-free Correction for the Nyquist Ghost in Echo-planar Imaging Using Deep Learning

A pilot study of short T2* measurements with ultrashort echo time imaging at 0.35 T

Lung T2 * mapping using 3D ultrashort TE with tight intervals δTE

UBES: Unified scatter correction using ultrafast Boltzmann equation solver for conebeam CT

Ultrafast T2 and T2* mapping using single‐shot spatiotemporally encoded MRI with reduced field of view and spiral out‐in‐out‐in trajectory

High-quality FLORET UTE imaging for clinical translation

Iterative Motion Compensation reconstruction ultra-short TE(iMoCo UTE) for high resolution free breathing pulmonary MRI

Investigation of Spatial-Temporal Kernel Method for Dynamic Imaging in Short and Long Range PET Scanners

The Dynamic Correction of Collimation Errors of CT Slicing Pictures

Correction of spatial distortion in EPI due to inhomogeneous static magnetic fields using the reversed gradient method