Abstract:Spiral trajectories require a correction on preclinical small‐animal scanners due to gradient infidelities. Four different correction methods were examined in phantom and in vivo experiments. Separate trajectory measurements yielded the best image quality, but other methods based on an isotropic delay or the gradient system transfer function (GSTF) produced comparable results. Remaining imperfections were attributed to nonlinear behavior of the gradient system. Overall, we demonstrated that high‐quality spiral images can be achieved in preclinical MRI without separate trajectory measurements. This study aimed to examine different trajectory correction methods for spiral imaging on a preclinical scanner with high‐performance gradients with respect to image quality in a phantom and in vivo. The gold standard method of measuring the trajectories in a separate experiment is compared to an isotropic delay‐correction, a correction using the gradient system transfer function (GSTF), and a combination of the two. Three different spiral trajectories, with 96, 16, and three interleaves, are considered. The best image quality is consistently achieved when determining the trajectory in a separate phantom measurement. However, especially for the spiral with 96 interleaves, the other correction methods lead to almost comparable results. Remaining imperfections in the corrected gradient waveforms and trajectories are attributed to asymmetrically occurring undulations in the actual, generated gradients, suggesting that the underlying assumption of linearity is violated. In conclusion, images of sufficient quality can be acquired on preclinical small‐animal scanners using spiral k‐space trajectories without the need to carry out separate trajectory measurements each time. Depending on the trajectory, a simple isotropic delay‐correction or a GSTF‐based correction can provide images of similar quality.

Strategies to Improve Intratrain Prospective Motion Correction for Turbo Spin‐echo Sequences with Constant Flip Angles

Controlling T 2 blurring in 3D RARE arterial spin labeling acquisition through optimal combination of variable flip angles and k-space filtering.

Motion-compensated 3D Turbo Spin-Echo for More Robust MR Intracranial Vessel Wall Imaging.

Prospective motion correction for magnetic resonance spectroscopy using single camera Retro-Grate reflector optical tracking

Motion correction using an enhanced floating navigator and GRAPPA operations.

High Temporal Resolution Retrospective Motion Correction with Radial Parallel Imaging

Unsupervised motion artifact correction of turbo spin‐echo MRI using deep image prior

A general algorithm for compensation of trajectory errors: Application to radial imaging

EXTRACT ( Extrapolation and Correlation ) : A New Ultra-Rapid Motion Correction Technique

Real-time motion correction in two-dimensional multislice imaging with through-plane navigator.

Automated Motion Correction for in Vivo Optical Projection Tomography

Rotational Motion Artifact Correction to MRI Sequences Based on Fast Scanning

On the correction of spiral trajectories on a preclinical MRI scanner with a high‐performance gradient insert

Correction of spatial distortion in EPI due to inhomogeneous static magnetic fields using the reversed gradient method

A rigid motion correction method for helical computed tomography (CT)

Expiration-Phase Template-Based Motion Correction of Free-Breathing Abdominal Dynamic Contrast Enhanced MRI

Acceleration and Motion‐correction Techniques for High‐resolution Intravascular MRI

Estimation of Physiological Motion Using Highly Accelerated Continuous 2D MRI

Retrospective Motion Correction in Gradient Echo MRI by Explicit Motion Estimation Using Deep CNNs

Improved optimization strategies for autofocusing motion compensation in MRI via the analysis of image metric maps.

A motion correction approach for oral and maxillofacial cone-beam CT imaging