COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT QUANTIFICATION METHODS FOR MICROFOSSIL CHARCOAL CONCENTRATION AND THE IMPLICATION FOR HUMAN ACTIVITIES

Yiyin Li,Shufang Hou,Pengfei Zhao

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1001-7410.2010.02.12

2010-01-01

Abstract:Microfossil charcoal is one of the important proxies for exploring fire history and ancient human activity. It is generally identified as being black,opaque and angular with a size smaller than 120μm.Five different quantification methods including touch point-counts,computerized imaging technique,particle counting,size-classes are employed to estimate the microfossil charcoal concentration. A comparison study shows that the results obtained with different quantification methods are significantly correlated(F-value>0.7,p-value<0.05)and display similar trend of change. The two touch point-counts methods(11 touch point-counts and 202 touch point-counts)have a particularly high correlation coefficient(F-value 0.93).By comparison,the correlation coefficient of touch point-counts and computerized imaging technique is 0.88.The coefficients between the size-classes and other quantification methods are found to vary with the particle size of the microfossil charcoal. The 202 touch point-counts method is considered to be a better method for quantifying microfossil charcoal as it has high coefficients with other methods,smaller error and costs less counting time. The peak values of microfossil charcoal for these quantification methods are shown to coincide with the period of prosperous cultures and indicate strong human activities.