The comparison study of multiple biochar stability assessment methods
Jiefeng Chen,Pengyu Wang,Lisha Ding,Ting Yu,Songqi Leng,Jie Chen,Liangliang Fan,Jingjing Li,Liang Wei,Jun Li,Qian Lu,Lijian Leng,Wenguang Zhou
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2021.105070
IF: 6
2021-06-01
Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis
Abstract:<p>The stability of biochar means the potential capability of fixing carbon in biochar in the soil environment. The stability assessment method is significant to its potential, but the comparative study on the stability of biochar assessed by multiple efficient methods was relatively limited. The evaluation methods, such as ultimate analysis, proximate analysis, the Edinburgh stability tool, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, solid state <sup>13</sup>C nuclear magnetic resonance, and thermogravimetric analysis, were used to assess the stability of biochars. And the biochars were pyrolyzed from soybean straw, wood dust, and <em>Chlorella Vulgaris</em> at the temperature ranging from 300 to 800 ℃. The statistical analysis (cluster analysis, correlation analysis, and regression fitting analysis) were used to compare the stability indicators of these methods. The stable carbon from the Edinburgh stability tool and volatile matter/ (fixed carbon + volatile matter) had high correlations with other indicators except C–C/C = C/C–H, and the proximate analysis may be developed as an alternative to O/C and H/C. These research findings help to confirm an accurate and efficient method for evaluating the stability of biochar.</p>
engineering, chemical,chemistry, analytical,energy & fuels