Interpretation of stable resonance frequency signals observed from microseismic monitoring during hydraulic fracturing

Hui YU,Haijiang ZHANG
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1001-1749.2017.01.13
2017-01-01
Abstract:During hydraulic fracturing, induced microseismic events are generally monitored by surface or downhole geophones to determine their locations from which the stimulated reservoir volume can be estimated. In a surface microseismic monitoring experiment carried out in Deyang of Sichuan province, microseismic events are not detected due to strong near surface attenuation and background noise. Instead, we detected continuous signals with stable resonance frequencies, which are well correlated with slurry flow. This kind of signals have been detected in other hydraulic fracturing monitoring cases and are interpreted as the Stonley waves by the interaction of high-pressure fluids with the surrounding fractures (Tary et al., 2014). In our case, through the time-frequency analysis we can obtain how frequency and amplitude of these resonant signals change with time at different stations. For the ~13 Hz resonant signal, its amplitude generally decreases at stations farther away from the well site, indicating that the signal is most likely originated from the surface well site. As a result, by using these stable resonant signals, it could provide us a way to monitor the vibration condition of high-pressure pipes used for hydraulic fracturing. Based on these facts, we propose that these resonant signals are caused by vibrations of high-pressure pipes triggered by periodic pressure pulses of triplex pumps. We further suggest that the interpretation of these resonant signals due to Stonely waves or nonlaminar flows by Tary et al. (2014) may be wrong based on several contradictive points with observations. They are also likely caused by vibrations of high-pressure pipes, similar to what we derived from our experiments.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?