Abstract:Purpose The purpose of this paper is to investigate the impact of fairness concern on the optimal pricing, carbon emission reduction (CER), green marketing efforts (GME) and utility of supply chain members in a two-echelon low-carbon supply chain composed of one manufacturer and one retailer. First, three basic models that consider the manufacturer's different attitudes toward the retailer's fairness concern are constructed. The optimal decisions of these models are obtained. Second, these optimal solutions are compared, and the effects of some key parameters including fairness concern on the optimal decisions and utility are examined for the three models. Furthermore, the manufacturer may misestimate the retailer's fairness concern; therefore, an extended model is proposed. Design/methodology/approach The authors adopt the manufacturer-led Stackelberg game theoretic framework, where the manufacturer decides the wholesale price and CER level and, then, the retailer determines the retail price and GME. Findings The results show that fairness concern has a negative impact on the wholesale price, the level of CER and GME, and fairness concern are not always beneficial for maximizing utility, although it is related to whether the manufacturer pays attention to the retailer's fairness concern. The manufacturer will gain more utility when considering the fairness concern of retailers than non-consideration. Overestimating or underestimating the fairness concern of the retailers does not lead to benefits for the manufacturer. Research limitations/implications This study has the following two limitations that need to be addressed in future research. First, the authors only consider the fairness concern of a single retailer but not peer-induced fairness among multiple competing retailers, which can be taken into account in future studies. Second, the demand function is linearly related to price, CER and GME. Because of the uncertainty of market information, the uncertainty demand function can be further considered. Originality/value This paper simultaneously considers the factors CER, GME and fairness concern. The utility function of the retailer is established according to taking the Nash bargaining solution as a fairness reference point, and four different models are constructed and compared.

Pricing and product green degree decisions in green supply chains with fairness concerns

Pricing-decision analysis of green supply chain with two competitive manufacturers considering horizontal and vertical fairness concerns

Pricing Policies of Green Dual-Channel Supply Chain with Fairness Concerns and Altruistic Preferences Based on Consumers' Environmental Awareness and Channel Preference

Supply chain decision-making of green products considering a retailer's fairness concerns under a pre-sale model

Pricing and Coordination Decisions in Autonomous Reduction Low-Carbon Supply Chain with Fairness Concerns

Analysis of green supply chains under fairness concern and differential power structure

Decisions and coordination of green e-commerce supply chain considering green manufacturer's fairness concerns

Research on Supply Chain Decision-making Considering Fairness Concerns and Green Technology Innovation

Carbon emission reduction and green marketing decisions in a two-echelon low-carbon supply chain considering fairness concern

Participant fairness concern and cost‐sharing‐based dual‐channel low‐carbon supply chain management

Decision-making in a low-carbon supply chain considering consumers' fairness concerns

Cooperative Game Analysis of Coordination Mechanisms under Fairness Concerns of a Green Retailer

Price and Carbon Emission Reduction Decisions and Revenue-Sharing Contract Considering Fairness Concerns

Green Subsidy Strategies and Fairness Concern in a Capital-Constrained Supply Chain

Pricing, Green Degree and Coordination Decisions in a Green Supply Chain with Loss Aversion

Optimal Decision-Making of Retailer-Led Dual-Channel Green Supply Chain with Fairness Concerns under Government Subsidies

The Green Product’s Pricing Strategy in a Dual Channel Considering Manufacturer’s Risk Attitude

Game theoretic analysis of prices and low-carbon strategy considering dual-fairness concerns and different competitive behaviours

Effects of manufacturer fairness concerns and carbon emission reduction investment on pricing decisions under countervailing power

Quality and Retail Pricing Decision in a Supply Chain with Fairness Concerns

A dual-channel secondary closed-loop supply chain considering retail groups and fairness concerns