Abstract:Considering that both the manufacturer’s production process and the transporter’s freight process produce carbon emissions, this paper constructed a three-echelon supply chain composed of a manufacturer, a transporter, and a retailer. This article studies the cooperative carbon emission reduction among the supply chain members under the carbon cap-and-trade policy and consumer environmental awareness. We used the Stackelberg game to explore four scenarios as follows: (1) in the non-cooperative decision model, no cooperation takes place among all supply chain members; (2) in the local cooperation decision of the manufacturer and the transporter alliance model, the manufacturer and the transporter work together to make decisions reducing carbon emissions, but each member of the supply chain makes its own pricing decisions; (3) in the local cooperation decision of the retailer-transporter alliance model, there is no cooperation except that the retailer and the transporter cooperate with each other to determine the selling price of the product; and (4) in the overall-cooperative decision model, there is complete cooperation among the members of the supply chain, who collectively decide on carbon emission reduction and the selling price of the product. Then, using the backward induction method, we derived and compared the equilibrium solutions and the profits of the supply chain system. The results showed that the scenario of complete cooperation among all supply chain members had the best performance in carbon emission reduction, market equilibrium quantity, and the supply chain system’s profit, but the selling price of the product was likely to be higher than other scenarios. Two contracts have been proposed to coordinate the supply chain system. The cost-sharing contract is effective but imperfect under limited constraints. The two-part tariff contract can realize perfect coordination of the supply chain. Finally, we obtained several interesting conclusions from the numerical example and provide managerial insights and policy implications from the analytical results.

Emission reduction in a supply chain with carbon tax policy

Pricing and Carbon Emission Reduction Decisions in a Supply Chain with a Risk-Averse Retailer under Carbon Tax Regulation

Contracting emission reduction for supply chains considering market low-carbon preference

Energy Performance Contracting in a Supply Chain under Cap-and-Trade Regulation and Carbon Tax Policy

Manufacture’s Optimal Pricing Policy and Retailer’s Optimal Ordering Policy under Different Carbon Emission Policies

Carbon emission reduction cooperation of three-echelon supply chain under consumer environmental awareness and cap-and-trade regulation

Low carbon strategy analysis with two competing supply chain considering carbon taxation

Retailer-driven incentive contracts for carbon emission reduction with carbon tax and yield uncertainty

Optimal control of carbon emission reduction strategies in supply chain with wholesale price and consignment contract

Pricing and coordination of a dual-channel supply chain with consideration of carbon tax

The impacts of retailer's carbon tax on the price and carbon reduction decisions in supply chain

Production and Joint Emission Reduction Decisions Based on Two-Way Cost-Sharing Contract under Cap-and-trade Regulation

Decisions and Coordination of Dual-Channel Supply Chain considering Retailers’ Bidirectional Fairness Concerns under Carbon Tax Policy

Emission reduction cooperation in a dynamic supply chain with competitive retailers

The Role of Revenue Sharing and First-Mover Advantage in Emission Abatement with Carbon Tax and Consumer Environmental Awareness

Selection of optimal coordination contract for sustainable supply chain under carbon tax

Analysis of Decision-Making in a Green Supply Chain under Different Carbon Tax Policies

Supply Chain Coordination with Revenue‐sharing Contracts Considering Carbon Emissions and Governmental Policy Making

Impact of Emission Reduction Investments on Decisions and Profits in a Supply Chain with Two Competitive Manufacturers

Study on Green Supply Chain Cooperation and Carbon Tax Policy considering Consumer’s Behavior

Carbon Emission Reduction Decision and Revenue-Sharing Contract with Consumers’ Low-Carbon Preference and CER Cost under Carbon Tax