Abstract:OBJECTIVE:To develop and evaluate scaling and scoring assumptions, and the reliability and the validity of a Chinese version of the SF-36 scales.METHODS:A multi-stage mixed sampling procedure was used to select a representative sample of the general population. The sample size was 1 000 households. All family members of a selected household, aged 18 and older, completed a survey by self-administration. Formal psychometric methods for testing assumptions underlying item scoring and scale construction were used according to the standard procedure of the IQOLA Project.RESULTS:Of the 1 985 collected questionnaires, 1 972 were qualified. Of them, 1 688 (85.6%) were respondents. 1 316 respondents answered all 36 items, while the remaining (372 respondents) answered with one or several missing responses. Among the non-respondents, 65.5% were illiteracy or quasi-illiteracy. The assumption of equal intervals was violated for the VT and MH scales. The recoded item values were used to calculate scale scores. The clustering and ordering of the item means were approximately the same as that of the source version and other two Chinese versions. The items in each scale had similar standard deviations except those in the PF, BP, SF scales. The correlations between an item and its hypothesized scale were identical for all except the SF and VT scales. The scaling success rates of convergent validity were 0% for the SF scale, 75% for the VT scale, and 100% for the other six scales. The scaling success rates of discriminat validity ranged from 87.5% to 100% for all scales except for the SF scale. The Cronbach' alpha coefficients of internal consistency reliability ranged from 0.72 to 0.88, which were satisfactory for group comparison except 0.39 for the SF scale and 0.66 for the VT scale. The two-weeks test-retest reliability coefficient ranged from 0.66 to 0.94. Factor analysis identified two principal components: a "physical" factor and a "mental" factor. Taken together, these two factors could be used to explain 56.3% of the total variance.CONCLUSION:The Chinese version of the SF-36 Health Survey Scale has achieved conceptual equivalence and satisfied the psychometric scaling assumptions well enough to warrant wide use in China. Known-groups validity will give more meaningful evidences of the validity of the Chinese SF-36 scales.

Initiative research on reliability of Bayley Scale of Infant Development -3rd Edition Screening Test in Shanghai

Research on the applicability of Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development-Third Edition to assess the development of infants and toddlers in Shanghai

Concurrent Validity of the Ages and Stages Questionnaire and the Bayley Scales of Infant Development III in China.

The Reliability and Validity of Bayley-III Cognitive Scale in China's Male and Female Children.

Concurrent validity of the MacArthur communicative development inventory, the Ages and Stages Questionnaires and the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development: A study in rural China

Evaluation of Social Competence and Behavior of Urban Children in China

Reliability and Validity of Standardized Chinese Version of Urban Infant–Toddler Social and Emotional Assessment

Reversion of Preschool Behavioral and Emotional Rating Scale in Chinese Preschoolers: Validity and Reliability

Reliability and Validity of an Instrument to Assess Pediatric Inpatients' Experience of Care in China.

Development and Psychometric Tests of a Chinese Version of the SF-36 Health Survey Scales.

The validity of the Chinese version of ASQ in high risk children

Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Readiness for Hospital Discharge Scale-Parent Form in parents of preterm infants

Reliability and Validity of the East Asia-Pacific Early Child Development Scales: A Longitudinal Validation Study in China

Reliability and Concurrent Validity of a Chinese Version of the Alberta Infant Motor Scale Administered to High-Risk Infants in China

Validity and reliability of the Behavior Rating Scale of Executive Function-Preschool Version parent form in China

A Study on the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire(SDQ)

[Reliability and Validity of Behavior Rating Scale of Executive Function Parent Form for School Age Children in China].

Application of the Chinese version of Parent Behavior Inventory

Formulation of Children Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (the Edition for Students) for Shanghai Norm

Analysis of 322 Cases of 2-Year-old Children Testing Results with Bayley Scales of Infant Development in Nanjing

The Chinese version of the Pediatric Quality of Life InventoryTM Infant Scales (PedsQLTM 13-24 months): reliability and validity in healthy infants