Abstract:Background The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) has become one of the most widely used measurement tools in child and adolescent mental health work across the globe. The SDQ was originally developed and validated within the UK and whilst its reliability and validity have been replicated in several countries important cross cultural issues have been raised. We describe normative data, reliability and validity of the Chinese translation of the SDQ (parent, teacher and self report versions) in a large group of children from Shanghai. Methods The SDQ was administered to the parents and teachers of students from 12 of Shanghai's 19 districts, aged between 3 and 17 years old, and to those young people aged between 11 and 17 years. Retest data was collected from parents and teachers for 45 students six weeks later. Data was analysed to describe normative scores, bandings and cut-offs for normal, borderline and abnormal scores. Reliability was assessed from analyses of internal consistency, inter-rater agreement, and temporal stability. Structural validity, convergent and discriminant validity were assessed. Results Full parent and teacher data was available for 1965 subjects and self report data for 690 subjects. Normative data for this Chinese urban population with bandings and cut-offs for borderline and abnormal scores are described. Principle components analysis indicates partial agreement with the original five factored subscale structure however this appears to hold more strongly for the Prosocial Behaviour, Hyperactivity – Inattention and Emotional Symptoms subscales than for Conduct Problems and Peer Problems. Internal consistency as measured by Cronbach's α coefficient were generally low ranging between 0.30 and 0.83 with only parent and teacher Hyperactivity – Inattention and teacher Prosocial Behaviour subscales having α > 0.7. Inter-rater correlations were similar to those reported previously (range 0.23 – 0.49) whilst test retest reliability was generally lower than would be expected (range 0.40 – 0.79). Convergent and discriminant validity are supported. Conclusion We report mixed findings with respect the psychometric properties of the Chinese translation of the SDQ. Reliability is a particular concern particularly for Peer Problems and self ratings by adolescents. There is good support for convergent validity but only partial support for structural validity. It may be possible to resolve some of these issues by carefully examining the wording and meaning of some of the current questions.

Reliability and Validity of the East Asia-Pacific Early Child Development Scales: A Longitudinal Validation Study in China

The Hong Kong Early Child Development Scale: A Validation Study

Concurrent Validity of the Ages and Stages Questionnaire and the Bayley Scales of Infant Development III in China.

Measuring Early Childhood Development with the Early Human Capability Index (ehci): A Reliability and Validity Study in China

Validity studies of a parent-completed social-emotional measure in a representative sample in China

Reversion of Preschool Behavioral and Emotional Rating Scale in Chinese Preschoolers: Validity and Reliability

Development and Validation of the Chinese Preschool Readiness Scale

Reliability and Validity of the Caregiver Reported Early Development Instruments (CREDI) in Impoverished Regions of China

Reliability and Validity of Adaptive Skill Rating Scale for School-aged Children

Can Parenting Styles and Dimensions Questionnaire (PSDQ) Be Used in China?

Age band 1 of the Movement Assessment Battery for Children-Second Edition: exploring its usefulness in mainland China.

The Validity, Reliability and Normative Scores of the Parent, Teacher and Self Report Versions of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire in China.

Reliability, Validity, and Responsiveness of the Chinese Learning Accomplishment Profile (C-LAP)

The Reliability and Validity of the Developmental Coordination Disorder Questionnaire’07 for Children Aged 4–6 Years in Mainland China

Validity and Reliability Analysis of the Chinese Parent Version of the Autism Spectrum Rating Scale (6–18 Years)

The Chinese version of the Pediatric Quality of Life InventoryTM Infant Scales (PedsQLTM 13-24 months): reliability and validity in healthy infants

Validating the Experiences in Close Relationships-Relationship Structures Scale among Chinese Children and Adolescents.

Validity and Reliability of the Chinese version of Psycho-Educational Profile for Children with Autism

Development of Adaptive Skill Rating Scale for School-aged Children

The Reliability and Validity of Bayley-III Cognitive Scale in China's Male and Female Children.

Validating the Social-Emotional Assessment Measure (36–66 Months) for Use Among Chinese Preschoolers