Qualitative Comparison of Perceptions Regarding Patient Engagement for Patient Safety by Physicians, Nurses, and Patients
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/ppa.s456050
2024-06-05
Patient Preference and Adherence
Abstract:Seung Gyeong Jang, 1 Minsu Ock, 2, 3 Soyoon Kim 4 1 College of Nursing, Inje University, Gimhae, South Korea; 2 Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea; 3 Department of Preventive Medicine, Ulsan University Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Ulsan, South Korea; 4 Department of Medical Law and Ethics, Asian Institute for Bioethics and Health Law, College of Medicine, Yonsei University, Seoul, Republic of Korea Correspondence: Minsu Ock, Ulsan University Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Daehagbyeongwon-ro 25, Dong-gu, Ulsan, 44033, Republic of Korea, Tel +82-52-230-1740, Email Purpose: Patient engagement in ensuring patient safety is widely acknowledged, there is still a need to explore how perceptions of patient engagement vary among different stakeholders within the healthcare system. We aimed to compare the perceptions regarding patient engagement for patient safety among physicians, nurses, and patients by exploring the perspectives. Patients and Methods: A qualitative study, comprising three focus group discussions (six to eight people each), was conducted in South Korea. Physicians and nurses who worked at the general hospital level or higher, and patients who had been hospitalized for more than 24 hours, were included. Researchers analyzed the transcripts, and a content analysis was performed to describe influencing elements of patient engagement for patient safety. A word cloud was created through keyword analysis of the transcripts. Results: Based on 479 coded data, three categories and eight sub-categories were derived. The first moment of patient engagement was viewed as the choice of medical institutions. Reputation occupied a large part in the hospital selection for all participants, but they did not know about or use the national hospital evaluation data. Participants said that continuous patient engagement, such as the patient's active questioning attitude, guardian's cooperation, sufficient medical personnel, and patient safety education was required during treatment. However, it was said that patient engagement was ignored after patient safety incidents occurred. They mentioned that they were emotional and busy arguing for their own positions, and that it was difficult to use a medical dispute resolution method in practice. In the word cloud by group, fall, explanation, hospital, and patient were common words. Conclusion: All three groups agreed on the importance of patient engagement for patient safety but differed in its influencing factors. Efforts should be made to reduce the difference between the three groups on how to involve patients for patient safety. Plain Language Summary: To what extent can patient engagement for patient safety be expanded? In this study, we confirmed the diverse perceptions of patients and medical personnel regarding patient engagement for patient safety. Physicians, nurses, and patients all answered that they did not generally know about the objective medical institutions evaluation data provided by the national, and said that when choosing a medical institution, patients depended on information from their reputation, social media, and web site search. During treatment, both patients and medical personnel expressed their hopes for active and independent engagement from patients, but also expressed the difficulty of requesting cooperation in engagement and difficulties in education. After the patient safety incident, both patients and medical personnel were emotional and occupied in asserting their respective positions, and they complained about difficulties in resolving medical disputes that are difficult to use in practice. Keywords: patient participation, patient safety, focus groups, health personnel The paradigm of healthcare delivery has shifted towards patient-centered care, where the preferences, values, and needs of patients are given paramount importance. 1 This approach recognizes the unique expertise that patients bring to their own care and emphasizes the importance of involving them actively in decision-making processes. 2,3 Central to this patient-centered approach is the concept of patient engagement, which entails the active participation of patients in their own healthcare management. Patient engagement (PE) for patient safety has been increasingly recognized as a critical factor in improving healthcare outcomes, including patient safety. The involvement of patients in their care not only enhances their understanding of medical conditions and treatment options but also promotes shared decision-making and adherence to treatment plans. 4,5</ -Abstract Truncated-
medicine, general & internal