COMPARISON AND ANALYSIS OF ULTRASOUND AND CT GUIDED PERCUTANEOUS LUNG BIOPSY IN DIAGNOSING PERIPHERAL PULMONARY MASSES

尹莉,梁晓宁,于泽兴,李硕,张颖,张玲玲,郭瑞君
DOI: https://doi.org/10.11723/mtgyyx1007-9564201612008
2016-01-01
Abstract:Objective To compare the detection rate and complication between ultrasound and CT guided percutaneous lung biopsy in the diagnosis of peripheral pulmonary masses and to analyze its influence fac‐tors .Methods Data were collected from 118 patients who underwent percutaneous lung biopsy for suspec‐ted lung cancer during the period from January 2013 to January 2015 in respiration medicine ,Beijing Chaoy‐ang Hospital .All of these patients were failed with bronchofiberscopy diagnosing but confirmed to be pul ‐monary masses with CT .The cases were allocated to ultrasound - or CT - guided confirmation group by the means of biopsy ,of which 57 cases were confirmed by ultrasound - guided approach and 61 ,by CT . The detection rate ,complications were compared between the two groups and the influence factors were tried to be analyzed .Results The detection rate of ultrasound guided group (93 .0% ) was higher than that of CT guided group(88 .5% ) ,the complications of ultrasound guided group(8 .8% ) was lower than that of CT guided group(19 .7% ) .The results showed no significant difference (χ2 = 0 .69 ,2 .84 ,both P> 0 .05) ;the frequency of pneumothorax in performing ultrasound guided percutaneous lung biopsy (1 .8% ) was lower than that in CT guided group (14 .8% ) .The result showed significant difference (χ2 = 4 .86 ,P <0 .05) .Conclusion Ultrasound guided percutaneous lung biopsy is a safe and effective means for pulmonary mass ,and is preferable to the cases with pulmonary mass that can be confirmed by ultrasonoscopy .
What problem does this paper attempt to address?