Abstract:PurposeIn China, most quality assessments (QAs) of the high‐contrast resolution of medical computed tomography (CT) equipment is performed by subjective evaluation, which is simple but dependent on observer expertise. The purpose of this study was to compare the accuracy and degree of dispersion of evaluation results from observers with different expertise and to develop an objective, easily understandable new approach to minimize the error caused by the subjective nature of observer evaluation. The accuracy and reproducibility of this new approach was validated and compared using both subjective and objective evaluation methods.MethodsThis new objective evaluation method of high‐contrast resolution was based on measurements of CT phantom images. The intensity profile of the aluminum line pairs’ (LPs’) images was extracted and quantified following the Rayleigh criterion. The interpolation method was employed to improve the consistency of the middle profile lines of each LP group for application of the Rayleigh criterion. With the introduction of a normalized margin, the accuracy of the results increased to the decimal level. Five junior observers and three QA professionals evaluated the high‐contrast resolution of three different CT scanners using the subjective method, modulation transfer function (MTF) method, and the new objective method, and the results were compared statistically.ResultsThe experimental standard deviations ranged from 0.4 LP/cm to 0.55 LP/cm for subjective visual inspection. The uncertainty of the expert group's results was much lower than that of the volunteer group. The experimental standard deviations of the MTF evaluation, according to both the standard deviation (SD) and point spread function (PSF) methods, were within the intervals of (0.04–0.06) LP/cm and (0.08–0.16) LP/cm, whereas that of the proposed objective evaluation method was approximately 0.02 LP/cm. The experimental data indicated that the results of the new objective evaluation were in accordance with those of the expert group's subjective evaluation and the MTF evaluation.ConclusionsIn this study, the subjective evaluation results from experienced observers showed relatively less uncertainty and more accuracy than those from inexperienced observers. Furthermore, a new objective evaluation approach that is easily understood, accurate, and reproducible was developed in this study. Results acquired using this new method were comparable with those of expert groups’ subjective evaluation and MTF evaluation. Specialized QA software that integrates the steps implemented in the new method is being developed to enhance the convenience of the approach and assist observers in obtaining accurate and replicable assessment results.

Influence of Phantom on the Verification Results of High Contrast Resolution of Medical CT Images

Study on the Optimized Scanning Conditions of Cerebral CT Angiography Based on the Angiographic CT Head Phantom

Contrast-Medium Anisotropy-Aware Tensor Total Variation Model for Robust Cerebral Perfusion CT Reconstruction with Low-Dose Scans

Metrology Applications of Quantitative Evaluation Methods in CT Phantom Images

The Application of Automatic Tube Current Modulation (atcm) on Image Quality and Radiation Dose at Abdominal Computed Tomography (ct): A Phantom Study

Channelized hotelling observer‐based low‐contrast detectability on the ACR CT accreditation phantom: Part II. Repeatability study

A Novel Objective Method for Assessing High-Contrast Spatial Resolution in CT Based on the Rayleigh Criterion.

An improved method of calculating MTF from PSF based on CT phantom images

A New Phantom Developed To Test The Atcm Performance Of Chest Ct Scanners

SU‐E‐I‐02: Characterizing Low‐Contrast Resolution for Non‐Circular CBCT Trajectories

Objective image quality assurance in cone‐beam CT: Test methods, analysis, and workflow in longitudinal studies

High resolution reconstruction for optimization of imaging quality of GE Discovery CT 750 HD

Impacts of acquisition and reconstruction parameters on the absolute technetium quantification of the cadmium–zinc–telluride-based SPECT/CT system: a phantom study

QM and QC Testing of CT Scanners

SU‐E‐I‐41: Study On the CT Radiation Attenuation Characteristics of Human Body for Phantom Design Using Monte Carlo Simulations

Iterative reconstruction with multifrequency signal recognition technology to improve low-contrast detectability: A phantom study

CT image quality evaluation in the age of deep learning: trade-off between functionality and fidelity

Experimental study to optimize configurations of PCD Spectral CT.

Assessment of a novel commercial large field of view phantom for comprehensive MR imaging quality assurance of a 0.35T MRgRT system

Objective image characterization of a spectral CT scanner with dual-layer detector

Image Quality Analysis of Photon-Counting CT Compared with Dual-Source CT: A Phantom Study for Chest CT Examinations