A Meta Analysis of Cisplatin Combined with Irinotecan or Etoposide in the Treatment of Extensive-Disease Small Cell Lung Cancer

Ying-ying ZHANG,Na-miao LI,Ya-li FAN,Rui-jing ZHAO,Li-na WANG,Jian-ying LI
DOI: https://doi.org/10.13638/j.issn.1671-4040.2019.03.001
2019-01-01
Abstract:Objective: To assess the efficacy and safety of cisplatin combined with IP or EP in patients with extensive-disease small cell lung cancer. Methods: The Pubmed, Medline, CNKI, VIP and Wanfang data were searched to collect the literature on cisplatin combined with irinotecan or etoposide in the treatment of extensive-disease small cell lung cancer, from creating database to August 2018.The Rev Man 5.3.0 software was used for meta-analysis. Results: There was no significant difference in clinical efficacy (RR) (OR=1.06, 95%CI: 0.93~1.21, P=0.41), disease control rate (DCR) (OR=1.02, 95%CI: 0.91~1.13, P=0.77) between IP group and EP group. In safety, there was mainly gastrointestinal toxicity (OR=3.80, 95%CI: 2.39~6.02, P<0.000 01) in IP group. And mainly hematotoxicity, especially neutropenia (OR=0.45, 95% CI: 0.29~0.70, P=0.000 4) in EP group. Conclusion: The efficacy of IP chemotherapy is similar to EP chemotherapy, and it has better clinical application value for small cell lung cancer. The toxicity of IP chemotherapy is mainly manifested in the digestive system, while the toxicity of EP chemotherapy is mainly manifested in bone marrow suppression.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?