Abstract:ObjectiveMid‐thoracic spinal tuberculosis is prone to kyphotic deformities and neurologic impairment. Posterior approach can effectively restore the spinal stability by reconstructing the anterior and middle spinal columns. Titanium mesh cages (TMC), allogeneic bone (ALB), and autogenous bone (AUB) are three main bone graft struts. We aimed to compare the therapeutic efficacy of three bone graft struts, for anterior and middle column reconstruction through a posterior approach in cases of mid‐thoracic spinal tuberculosis.MethodsHundred and thirty seven patients with thoracic spinal tuberculosis who had undergone a posterior approach from June 2010 to December 2018 were enrolled. Of them, 46 patients were treated using a titanium mesh cage (TMC group), 44 with allogenic bone grafts (ALB group), and 47 using autogenous bone grafts (AUB group). The following were analyzed to evaluate clinical efficacy: visual analogue scale (VAS) values, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C‐reactive protein (CRP) levels, kyphotic Cobb's angle, operation duration, intraoperative blood loss, improvement in American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) grade and in the mental component summary (MCS) and physical component summary (PCS) of Short Form‐36 (SF‐36), duration of bone graft fusion. The data of the three groups were compared by way of variance analysis, followed by the LSD⁃t test to compare each group. A repeated measures ANOVA was used to analyze the dates of pre‐, postoperative and final follow‐up.ResultsThe follow‐up duration was at least 3 years. All patients achieved a complete cure for spinal TB. Neurological performance and quality of life were remarkably improved at the final follow‐up. The intraoperative blood loss, operation time and VAS values 1 day postoperatively for TMC group and ALB group were significantly lower than those in AUB group (P < 0.05). The duration of bone graft fusion in ALB group (18.1 ± 3.7 months) was longer than that in TMC group and AUB group (9.5 ± 2.8 and 9.2 ± 1.9 months) (P < 0.05). No significant intergroup differences were observed in terms of age or preoperative, 3‐months postoperative, and final follow‐up indices of ESR and CRP among the three groups (P > 0.05). At the final follow‐up, the correction loss was mild (2.1 ± 0.9, 2.2 ± 1.0, 2.1 ± 0.8) and Cobb's angles of the three groups were 20.1 ± 2.9, 20.5 ± 3.2, 20.9 ± 3.4, respectively, which were remarkably rectified in comparison with the preoperative measurements (P < 0.05).ConclusionsIn terms of postoperative recovery and successful fusion rate of bone graft, it seems that posterior instrumentation, debridement, and interbody fusion with titanium mesh cages are more effective and appropriate surgical methods for mid‐thoracic spinal tuberculosis.

Comparison of Clinical Effect of Anterior and Posterior Focus Resection and Bone Graft on Spinal Tuberculosis

Posterior debridement and internal fixation for ultralong segmental tuberculosis in thoracic and lumbar vertebra through cross-window

Comparison of single posterior debridement, bone grafting and instrumentation with single-stage anterior debridement, bone grafting and posterior instrumentation in the treatment of thoracic and thoracolumbar spinal tuberculosis

Comparison of Anterior and Posterior Internal Fixation for Thoracolumbar Tuberculosis

[Anterior Instrumentation for the Treatment of Tuberculotic Spinal Deformity].

Clinical Effectiveness of the Posterior Affected-Vertebrae Fixation Method in Posterior-Anterior Surgery to Treat Thoracic Spinal Tuberculosis.

[Anterior Interbody Autografting and Internal Fixation for Primary Surgical Management of Thoracolumbar Spinal Tuberculosis].

Posterior internal fixation and anterior debridement and fusion in treatment of thoracolumbar spinal tuberculosis

Comparison of the Effects of One-stage Combination of the Anterior and Posterior Approaches with Simple Anterior Fixation in the Treatment of Lumbar Tuberculosis

Indication and Effect of Internal Fixation,debridement and Interbody Fusion to Treat Spinal Tuberculosis Via Posterior Approach Only

Intermediate Outcomes Evaluation of Anterior Approach Focus-Elimination,bone Autografting and Internal Fixation in the First Stage for Spinal Tuberculosis

Observation on short term effect of anterior trans-injured vertebral short segment limited fixation and fusion in treating thoracic and lumbar spinal tuberculosis

Anterior debridement, titanium cage fusion with bone grafting combined with internal fixation for primary surgical management of thoracolumbar spinal tuberculosis

Advantages of anterior approach in treatment of thoracolumbar tuberculosis

Comparing Bone Graft Techniques for Interbody Fusion Through a Posterior Approach for Treating Mid‐Thoracic Spinal Tuberculosis: A Retrospective Analysis

Treatment of thoracic and lumbar spinal tuberculosis via anterolateral approach with one-stage focus debridement and bone grafting with double screw-rods internal fixation system

Comparative Research of Interfixation and Non-interfixation Applied to Treate the Thoracolumbar Spinal Tuberculosis

One-stage Anterior Debridement, Bone Grafting and Posterior Instrumentation Vs. Single Posterior Debridement, Bone Grafting, and Instrumentation for the Treatment of Thoracic and Lumbar Spinal Tuberculosis

Different Operation Methods for Thoracolumbar Spinal Tuberculosis

Complete Debridement and Bone Graft with Anterior Instrumentation for Spinal Tuberculosis

One stage debridement and bone graft fusion with combined anterior and posterior fixation in treatment of recurrent thoracolumbar tuberculosis