Abstract:OBJECTIVE: Surgical treatment is an important strategy for the treatment of spinal tuberculosis (TB). Several approaches have been reported for the surgery. However, no single study has had a large enough sample population to definitively determine whether the single posterior approach is as effective and safe as the combined posterior and anterior approach for the treatment of spinal TB. A meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of posterior versus combined posterior and anterior approach for the treatment of spinal TB. METHODS: In this meta-analysis, electronic databases, such as PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Google scholar, and Cochrane library, were searched to select the potentially relevant reports that compared the outcomes of the posterior approach (group A) with the combined posterior and anterior approach (group B) in the treatment of spinal TB. Relevant journals and references were also searched manually. Data extraction and quality assessment were according with Cochrane Collaboration guidelines. Outcome assessments were operation time, blood loss, correction of angle, loss of correction, hospital stay, fusion time of the grafting bone, neurological improvement, and complications after surgery. Results were expressed as odds ratio for dichotomous outcomes and mean difference for continuous outcomes with 95% confidence interval. RESULTS: Five controlled clinical trials published between 2012 and 2014, involving 253 patients (group A, 129; group B, 124) with spinal TB were retrieved in this study. The overall meta-analysis showed that there were significant differences (P<0.01) between groups A and B in operation time, blood loss, hospital stay, and complications after surgery. However, no significant differences (P>0.05) were observed in correction of angle, loss of correction at the final follow-up, fusion time of the grafting bone, and neurological improvement after surgery between groups A and B. CONCLUSIONS: The posterior approach appeared to have the same clinical efficacy, but with less operation time, blood loss, hospital stay, and complications compared with the combined posterior and anterior approach in the treatment of sinal TB. However, more high-quality, randomized controlled trials are required to compare these approaches and guide clinical decision-making.

Indication and Effect of Internal Fixation,debridement and Interbody Fusion to Treat Spinal Tuberculosis Via Posterior Approach Only

Posterior debridement and internal fixation for ultralong segmental tuberculosis in thoracic and lumbar vertebra through cross-window

[Anterior Instrumentation for the Treatment of Tuberculotic Spinal Deformity].

Clinical Effectiveness of the Posterior Affected-Vertebrae Fixation Method in Posterior-Anterior Surgery to Treat Thoracic Spinal Tuberculosis.

[Anterior Interbody Autografting and Internal Fixation for Primary Surgical Management of Thoracolumbar Spinal Tuberculosis].

Efficacy of Surgery Via the Single Anterior and Single Posterior Approaches for Treatment of Thoracic Spinal Tuberculosis.

Two One-Stage Posterior Approaches for Treating Thoracic and Lumbar Spinal Tuberculosis: A Retrospective Case-Control Study.

[Clinical Efficacy of Posterior Intervertebral Surgery for Treating Single-Segment Thoracolumbar Spinal Tuberculosis].

One-stage Anterior Debridement, Bone Grafting and Posterior Instrumentation Vs. Single Posterior Debridement, Bone Grafting, and Instrumentation for the Treatment of Thoracic and Lumbar Spinal Tuberculosis

Comparison of Clinical Effect of Anterior and Posterior Focus Resection and Bone Graft on Spinal Tuberculosis

One-stage Posterior and Anterior Surgical Management of Thoracolumbar Spinal Tuberculosis

Comparison of Anterior and Posterior Internal Fixation for Thoracolumbar Tuberculosis

Posterior Transpedicular Screw Internal Fixation and Anterior Lesional Resection and Interbody Fusion for Treating Thoracic and Lumbar Spinal Tuberculosis

[Surgical Treatment for Thoracic Spinal Tuberculosis with Intraspinal Abscesses by Unilateral Vertebral Lamina Limited Decompression Via Posterior-Only Approach].

Efficacy and Safety of Posterior Versus Combined Posterior and Anterior Approach for the Treatment of Spinal Tuberculosis: A Meta-Analysis.

One-stage Surgical Treatment for Thoracic and Lumbar Spinal Tuberculosis by Transpedicular Fixation, Debridement, and Combined Interbody and Posterior Fusion Via a Posterior-Only Approach

Advantages of anterior approach in treatment of thoracolumbar tuberculosis

Treatment of Spinal Tuberculosis with Anterior Partial Vertebrectomy,iliac Grafting and Internal Fixation

Efficacy Analysis of One-Stage Posterior-Only Surgical Treatment for Thoracic Spinal Tuberculosis in the T4–6 Segments with Minimum 5-Year Follow-Up

Posterior internal fixation and anterior debridement and fusion in treatment of thoracolumbar spinal tuberculosis

Comparison of single posterior debridement, bone grafting and instrumentation with single-stage anterior debridement, bone grafting and posterior instrumentation in the treatment of thoracic and thoracolumbar spinal tuberculosis