Comparative Study of 2μm Laser, Holmium Laser and Transurethral Resection for Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer

HU Yangyang,NIU Xiaozhen,WANG Guangchun,HUANG Jianhua,LIU Min,PENG Bo
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3978/j.issn.2095-6959.2016.04.019
2017-01-01
Abstract:Objective: To compare the effcacy and safety of 2 μm laser, holmium laser and transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) for the treatment of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC).Methods: From June 2011 to June 2013, 210 patients newly diagnosed with primary NMIBC were randomly divided into conventional TURBT group (n=70), holmium laser group (n=70) and 2 μm laser group (n=70). Operative time, complications, postoperative bladder irrigation, catheterization time, hospitalization time were documented. A 2-year follow- up study was performed postoperatively, intravesical chemotherapy with epirubicin and cystoscopy were conducted simultaneously. Tumor recurrence rate was calculated and compared.Results: All patients had received corresponding operations successfully. hTere was no statistically difference among the three groups for the mean operative time and incidence of blood transfusion (P>0.05). hTe incidences of obturator nerve relfex and bladder perforation, postoperative bladder irrigation, catheterization time, hospitalization time were signiifcantly higher in TURBT group than in 2 μm laser and holmium laser group, while there was no signiifcant difference between 2 μm laser group and holmium laser group. During the 2-year follow-up study postoperatively, 24 patients lost to follow-up, there was no signiifcant difference in tumor recurrence rate among the three groups.Conclusion:hTe use of 2 μm laser and holmium laser in the management of NMIBC were superior to conventional TURBT, while there was no signiifcant difference between 2 μm laser and holmium laser in clinical effcacy. hTere were no differences in tumor recurrence rate and survival rate without tumor recurrence among the three groups. A longer follow-up period and larger numbers of patients are necessary to demonstrate the present results in the future.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?