Abstract:The novel robot-assisted (RA) technique has been utilized increasingly to improve the accuracy of cervical pedicle screw placement. Although the clinical application of the RA technique has been investigated in several case series and comparative studies, the superiority and safety of RA over conventional freehand (FH) methods remain controversial. Meanwhile, the intra-pedicular accuracy of the two methods has not been compared for patients with cervical traumatic conditions. This study aimed to compare the rate and risk factors of intra-pedicular accuracy of RA versus the conventional FH approach for posterior pedicle screw placement in cervical traumatic diseases. A total of 52 patients with cervical traumatic diseases who received cervical screw placement using RA (26 patients) and FH (26 patients) techniques were retrospectively included. The primary outcome was the intra-pedicular accuracy of cervical pedicle screw placement according to the Gertzbin–Robbins scale. Secondary outcome parameters included surgical time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative drainage, postoperative hospital stay, and complications. Moreover, the risk factors that possibly affected intra-pedicular accuracy were assessed using univariate analyses. Out of 52 screws inserted using the RA method, 43 screws (82.7%) were classified as grade A, with the remaining 7 (13.5%) and 2 (3.8%) screws classified as grades B and C. In the FH cohort, 60.8% of the 79 screws were graded A, with the remaining screws graded B (21, 26.6%), C (8, 10.1%), and D (2, 2.5%). The RA technique showed a significantly higher rate of optimal intra-pedicular accuracy than the FH method ( P = 0.008), but there was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of clinically acceptable accuracy ( P = 0.161). Besides, the RA technique showed remarkably longer surgery time, less postoperative drainage, shorter postoperative hospital stay, and equivalent intraoperative blood loss and complications than the FH technique. Furthermore, the univariate analyses showed that severe obliquity of the lateral atlantoaxial joint in the coronal plane ( P = 0.003) and shorter width of the lateral mass at the inferior margin of the posterior arch ( P = 0.014) were risk factors related to the inaccuracy of C1 screw placement. The diagnosis of HRVA ( P < 0.001), severe obliquity of the lateral atlantoaxial joint in the coronal plane ( P < 0.001), short pedicle width ( P < 0.001), and short pedicle height ( P < 0.001) were risk factors related to the inaccuracy of C2 screw placement. RA cervical pedicle screw placement was associated with a higher rate of optimal intra-pedicular accuracy to the FH technique for patients with cervical traumatic conditions. The severe obliquity of the lateral atlantoaxial joint in the coronal plane independently contributed to high rates of the inaccuracy of C1 and C2 screw placements. RA pedicle screw placement is safe and useful for cervical traumatic surgery.

Accuracy of Robot-Assisted Pedicle Screws Placement

Risk factors for robot-assisted spinal pedicle screw malposition

Accuracy of Robot-Assisted Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Placement for Treatment of Lumbar Spondylolisthesis: A Comparative Cohort Study

Pedicle screw accuracy in clinical utilization of minimally invasive navigated robot-assisted spine surgery

Robotic spine systems: overcoming surgeon experience in pedicle screw accuracy: a prospective study

The pedicle screw accuracy using a robotic system and measured by a novel three-dimensional method

Comparison of Accuracy of Pedicle Screw Insertion Among 4 Guided Technologies in Spine Surgery

Decreasing the Pedicle Screw Misplacement Rate in the Thoracic Spine With Robot-guided Navigation

Comparison of the Accuracy Between Robot-Assisted and Conventional Freehand Pedicle Screw Placement: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

[A Comparative Study of Robot-Assisted and Freehand Pedicle Screw Placement in Upper Thoracic Surgery].

Evaluating robotic pedicle screw placement against conventional modalities: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Clinical application of spinal robot in cervical spine surgery: safety and accuracy of posterior pedicle screw placement in comparison with conventional freehand methods

[Analysis of the accuracy between orthopedic robot-assisted and traditional manual pedicle screw placement techniques in adult degenerative scoliosis posterior surgery]

Three-dimensional Assessment of Robot-Assisted Pedicle Screw Placement Accuracy and Instrumentation Reliability Based on a Preplanned Trajectory

Fully automated determination of robotic pedicle screw accuracy and precision utilizing computer vision algorithms

Accuracy of percutaneous pedicle screw insertion in thoracic and lumbar spine

Flattening the learning curve - Early experience of robotic-assisted pedicle screw placement in spine surgery

Safety and Accuracy of Cannulated Pedicle Screw Placement in Scoliosis Surgery: a Comparison of Robotic-Navigation, O-arm-based Navigation, and Freehand Techniques

Accuracy and postoperative assessment of robot-assisted placement of pedicle screws during scoliosis surgery compared with conventional freehand technique: a systematic review and meta-analysis

The safety and accuracy of robot-assisted pedicle screw internal fixation for spine disease

Guideline for Thoracolumbar Pedicle Screw Placement Assisted by Orthopaedic Surgical Robot.