Quality of Life in patients following treatment of unstable distal radial fractures with locking compression plate and external fixator:a comparative study

张瑾,张光明,杨运发,邓卫兵,王东山,彭源,陈钰杰,张顺喜,郭媛
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-1927.2014.06.010
2014-01-01
Abstract:Objective To evaluate the efficacy of locking compression plate (LCP) internal fixation versus external fixator(EF)for the treatment of unstable distal radial fractures with the quality of life (QoL).Methods A total of 50 patients who underwent surgery for unstable distal radial fractures between January 2012 and June 2014 were recruited and randomly divided into the LCP group and the EF group(n=25 each).Eight patients finally lost to follow-up or with incomplete scales were excluded.The QoL,the percentage ratios of ipsilateral to contralateral values in range of motion (ROM),grip strength and pinch strength of wrist joint,wrist joint function score,the radiographic index and other objective indicators were compared between the two groups after 3 months and 1 year of the operation.Meanwhile,all the parameters at different time points of two groups were compared.Results At 3 months and 1 year after the operation,there were no significant differences between the two groups in most objective functional indicators and the sub-scores of all QoL domains.Statistically,all these findings tended to favor the use of EF at 3 months,and favor the use of LCP at 1 year after the operation.Compared with before operation,the improvement in OoL was greater in the LCP group compared to the EF group.Conclusions There are no signi fi cant differences in short-term and long-term QoL between the two groups.In both groups,the long-term QoL is significantly better than the long-term QoL,suggesting that either of the surgical options can be effectively applied to treat unstable distal radial fractures with satisfatory long term efficacy.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?