Two Approaches of Vaginal Hysterectomy for Non-Prolapsed Uterus: A Randomized Controlled Trial

LIU Hai-fang,CHEN Xu,LIU Yan
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-1927.2013.06.011
2013-01-01
Abstract:Objective To compare the procedures and outcomes of two approaches of vaginal hysterectomy for non-prolapsed uterus,and to investigate the efficacy of BiClamp forceps.Methods Between June 2006 and June 2013,100 patients with non-prolapsed uterus who received vaginal hysterectomy in our hospital and Changzheng Hospital of The Second Military Medical University were,by using random number table,randomized to BiClamp group (n=54) and conventional surgery group (n=46).All the operations were performed by the same team of gynecologists.The duration of operation,blood loss,the weight of dissected uterus,postoperative morbidity (2 or more consecutive quarterly measurements within a day using mouth thermometer suggesting the temperature of 38 degrees or greater between day 1 and 10) and postoperative length of hospital stay were compared.Results The BiClamp group yielded a markedly shorter duration of operation [(36.55±7.25) min vs (56.93±9.33)min],reduced blood loss [(41.12±-2.83) ml vs (104.12±8.48)ml] and decreased postoperative morbidity [3.70% (2/54) vs 8.70% (4/46)] compared with conventional operation group (all P<0.05).However,there was no marked difference in the weight of the disected uterus [(395.49±21.74)g vs (380.32± 18.81)g] and the postoperative length of hospital stay [(3.88 ± 1.22)d vs (4.05 ±0.97)d] (both P>0.05).No severe complications were reported.Conclusion Apart from the simplification of the procedures,the application of BiClamp reduces the operation duration,blood loss of vaginal hysterectomy and is characterized by a shorter time to recovery,and therefore should be considered as a worthwhile technique for future.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?