69 cases of laparoscopic assisted vaginal hysterectomy

Jing Gong,Jia Kong,Xing Su,Jun Zhang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-4777.2016.08.032
2016-01-01
Abstract:Objective To evaluate the clinical efficacy of Iaparoscopic assisted vaginal hysterectomy (LAVH) and summarize operation experiences.Methods Totally 170 cases of LAVH from January 2014 to January 2016 were retrospectively analyzed and divided into observation group (LAVH for difficult uterus,69 cases) and control group(routine total LAVH,101 cases).Glinical data,operation times,intraoperative blood losses,rates of converting to laparotomy,average hospitalization days and incidences of postoperative complications were analyzed between groups.Results The age,body mass index and the history of abdominal operations had no significant differences between groups(P > 0.05).In terms of uterine diseases,case numbers of hysteromyoma and adenomyosis/endometriosis in observation group were significantly higher than those in control group;the case number of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in observation group was significantly lower than that in control group [29 cases(42.0%) vs 17 cases(16.8%),17 cases(24.6%) vs 9 cases(8.9%),3 cases(4.3%) vs 35 cases (34.7%)] (P < 0.05 or P < 0.05).The operation time and intraoperative blood loss in observation group were significantly higher than those in control group [(76 ± 32) min vs (40 ± 25) min,(159 ± 73) ml vs (51 ± 35) ml](P < 0.01).The rate of converting to laparotomy,average hospitalization days and the incidence of postoperative complications had no significant differences between groups (P > 0.05).Conclusions LAVH treating difficult uterus is safe and effective.Although the operation time and intraoperative blood loss of difficult LAVH are higher than those of routine LAVH,average hospitalization days and the incidence of postoperative complications have no differences.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?