Abstract:Background and aims: Duodenoscopes have been implicated in the transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDRO). We compared the frequency of duodenoscope contamination with MDRO or any other bacteria after disinfection or sterilization by 3 different methods. Methods: We performed a single-center prospective randomized study in which duodenoscopes were randomly reprocessed by standard high-level disinfection (sHLD), double high-level disinfection (dHLD), or standard high-level disinfection followed by ethylene oxide gas sterilization (HLD/ETO). Samples were collected from the elevator mechanism and working channel of each duodenoscope and cultured before use. The primary outcome was the proportion of duodenoscopes with an elevator mechanism or working channel culture showing 1 or more MDRO; secondary outcomes included the frequency of duodenoscope contamination with more than 0 and 10 or more colony-forming units (CFU) of aerobic bacterial growth on either sampling location. Results: After 3 months of enrollment, the study was closed because of the futility; we did not observe sufficient events to evaluate the primary outcome. Among 541 duodenoscope culture events, 516 were included in the final analysis. No duodenoscope culture in any group was positive for MDRO. Bacterial growth of more than 0 CFU was noted in 16.1% duodenoscopes in the sHLD group, 16.0% in the dHLD group, and 22.5% in the HLD/ETO group (P = .21). Bacterial growth or 10 or more CFU was noted in 2.3% of duodenoscopes in the sHLD group, 4.1% in the dHLD group, and 4.2% in the HLD/ETO group (P = .36). MRDOs were cultured from 3.2% of pre-procedure rectal swabs and 2.5% of duodenal aspirates. Conclusions: In a comparison of duodenoscopes reprocessed by sHLD, dHLD, or HLD/ETO, we found no significant differences between groups for MDRO or bacteria contamination. Enhanced disinfection methods (dHLD or HLD/ETO) did not provide additional protection against contamination. However, insufficient events occurred to assess our primary study end-point. ClinicalTrials.gov no: NCT02611648.

Effect of a novel adjunctive cleansing method for duodenoscope

STUDY ON WASHING METHOD OF MEDICAL APPARATUS AND INSTRUMENT

Investigating the failure of repeated standard cleaning and disinfection of a Pseudomonas aeruginosa–infected pancreatic and biliary endoscope

Effect of a novel endoscope cleaning brush on duodenoscope contamination

Cleaning Effects of New Cleaning Approaches for Flexible Endoscope

A Study of the Efficacy of Bacterial Biofilm Cleanout for Gastrointestinal Endoscopes

Contamination of Disposable Distal Cap Duodenoscopes and Detachable Elevator Duodenoscopes After Reprocessing: A Randomized Trial

Effect of an Automated Flexible Endoscope Channel Brushing System on Improving Reprocessing Quality: a Randomized Controlled Study.

Randomized Comparison of 3 High-Level Disinfection and Sterilization Procedures for Duodenoscopes

Endoscopic Biopsy Channels Washed by Endoscopic Cleaning Brush and Disposable Swab Club:A Comparison of Their Clearance Effect

Effects of two methods on cleaning and disinfecting endoscopy buttons: a randomized controlled trial

Effect of a Disposable Endoscope Precleaning Kit in the Cleaning Procedure of Gastrointestinal Endoscope: A Multi-Center Observational Study

Application of a new double-headed endoscopic cleaning brush to soft endoscope cleaning

Comparison of Effect of Cleaning of Endoscopes Between Lavage-Brushing Method of Multienzyme Cleaner Stock Solution and Soaked Method of Multienzyme Cleaner Application Solution

A prospective, multicenter, clinical study of duodenoscope contamination after reprocessing

Comparative Study of Microbiological Monitoring Results from Three Types of Sampling Methods after Gastrointestinal Endoscope Reprocessing

Cleaning quality management of laparoscopic surgery instruments

Effect of different disinfection approaches on environment of interventional catheter lab

Efficacy of spray flushing in the reprocessing of flexible endoscopes: A randomized controlled trial

Impact of Duodenoscope Reprocessing Factors on Duodenoscope Contamination: A Retrospective Observational Study

Investigation and Analysis of Cleaning and Disinfection of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy in 42 Hospital