Different Reconstructions of Multi-Slice Spiral CT in Diagnosing Rib Fractures: a Comparative Study

李云卿,高光峰,刘连杰,贾玉泉,祁吉,马国林
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1672-5131.2005.04.009
2005-01-01
Abstract:Objective To probe role of post-imaging treatment of multi-slice spiral CT in diagnosing rib fracture. Methods MSCT scanning and a variety of reconstructions of the images were performed for 48 patients suspicious of rib fractures indicated by X- ray in order to bring out differences in displaying the fractures. Results 65 rib fractures in 48 patients were found with X-ray films while 217 rib fractures with MSCT. 12 fractures were found out by MSCT from 8 X-ray films that did not display fractures. 17 doubtful fractures on the X-ray films were confirmed as fractures (7 fractures) or excluded (10 fractures) by MSCT. Moreover, many hidden fractures or lesions were detected by MSCT as: 2 fractures in sternum, 3 fractures in thoracic vertebra, 1 fracture in scapula, 12 cases of pneumohemothorax, 15 cases of lung contusion, and 2 cases of mediastinal hematoma. In contrast, X-ray films detected merely 10 cases of pneumohemothorax and 5 cases of lung contusion. Both X-ray film and MSCT found 7 fractures in clavicle. Transverse scanning was able to find out fine fractures however lacking three-dimensional information. VR and SSD reconstruction enjoy a strong 3D sense, helping to observe fracture displacement and joint dislocation with multi-angle and multi-position. MPR was better in displaying ways of fracture lines and dislocation in addition to showing lesions in surrounding soft tissues. Conclusion MSCT is superior to conventional X-ray exam in detecting rib fractures, its post-imaging treatment has varied advantages. If a transverse scanning is combined with one or several procedures as MPR or SSD or VR, more reliable images can be obtained for the purpose of clinical or forensic use.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?