Analysis of published articles supported by Clinical Nursing Fund in 12 core nursing journals from 2012 to 2014

陈琼,程金莲,董丽娟,孙玉梅
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1009-6493.2017.04.010
2017-01-01
Abstract:Objective:To know about the scientific status quo and existing problems of clinical nursing fund supported research in China in recent three years.Methods:The papers published in 1 2 nursing core j ournals were analyzed by using bibliometrics from year distribution,source of the fund,number of cooperative authors, numbers of cooperative institutions,regional distribution,research methods,application of statistics,discipline distribution,research contents and so on.Results:The ratio of clinical nursing fund supported papers published in Chinese from 2012 to 2014 gradually increased.The percentage of the papers in Chinese and SCI papers was 22.90% and 43.64% respectively;most of the funds came from provincial level(33.11% in Chinese and 24.31%in SCI);the number of cooperative authors of papers in SCI mainly was 3(14.58%),5(15.97%)and 6(14.58%);the number of cooperative authors of papers in Chinese mainly was 3(22.71%);most of the authors came from the same institution(71.87% in Chinese papers and 35.42% in SCI papers).The most published area of the fund supported papers in Chinese was Guangdong(18.23%),and the most published area of the fund supported pa-pers in SCI was Hong Kong(19.44%).The main topic was the oncology nursing(14.45% in Chinese and 15.97% in SCI)and disease or symptoms nursing(22.95% in Chinese and 13.89% in SCI).Conclusions:The number of clinical nursing fund supported papers increased,however,the proportion of the papers was still smaller than that of the SCI papers.The cooperation trend was increased,and the output of scientific research in the economi-cally developed areas was more than other areas.There were more fund supported papers in oncology nursing and disease and symptom nursing.The source of fund was single.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?