Performance of double-antibody sandwich ELISA for chromogranin A determination

Yuyi HU,Hui WU,Xu HAN,Chunyan ZHANG,Wei GUO,Wenhui LOU,Baishen PAN
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1673-8640.2018.01.010
IF: 1.865
2018-01-01
Laboratory Medicine
Abstract:Objective To evaluate the performance of double-antibody sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)for chromogranin A (CgA)determination. Methods The precision,linearity and limit of determination of CgA determination by double-antibody sandwich ELISA were verified according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) EP15-A,EP6-A and EP17-A. The accuracy of CgA determination was assessed by manufacturer's quality control materials. A total of 66 neuroendocrine neoplasm patients,41 healthy subjects and 65 disease control patients were enrolled. The CgA levels in the 3 groups were determined, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to compare the efficiency of CgA determination in diagnosing neuroendocrine neoplasm. Results The within-run and between-run coefficients of variation (CV) of CgA determination by double-antibody sandwich ELISA were <14.00% and <8.00%,respectively. For accuracy evaluation,the relative bias was 4.51%,when the mean of results was within the indicated range. There was a good linear correlation(Y=0.793X-3.791,r2=0.988) in the range of 8-740 ng/mL. The limit of determination was 7.93 ng/mL. The difference of CgA levels in neuroendocrine neoplasm,healthy control and disease control groups had statistical significance (P<0.0001). The area under curve(AUC)of CgA determination in distinguishing healthy subjects and neuroendocrine neoplasm patients was 0.741,when the cut-off value was 47.18 ng/mL. The sensitivity was 78.8%,and the specificity was 68.3%. Conclusions CgA determination by double-antibody sandwich ELISA has good performance in precision,accuracy,linearity and limit of determination,which meets clinical needs. Serum CgA levels increase in patients with neuroendocrine neoplasm. CgA could be a marker for distinguishing healthy subjects and neuroendocrine neoplasm patients.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?