Comparison of ultrasonic elastography-guided fine needle aspiration and ultrasonic-guided core needle aspiration for the malignant cervical lymph nodes

Jie CHEN,Weihua WU,Lei WANG,Qizhi LIU,Xia GONG,Ling YANG
2017-01-01
Journal of Medical Imaging
Abstract:Objective To compare the diagnostic efficacy between ultrasonic elastography-guided fine needle aspiration and ultrasonic-guided core needle aspiration cytology in 180 cervical malignant lymph nodes.Methods A total of 180 lung cancer patients with 180 cervical malignant lymph nodes were analyzed retrospectively.90 cases were examined by fine needle aspiration guided by ultrasonic elastography and 90 cases were examined by core needle aspiration guided by traditional ultrasonic.Among the latter cases, 45 were by 16G biopsy needles and 45 by 18G biopsy needles.All of them were diagnosed by cytology.The satisfaction rate and accuracy rate of sampling were analyzed.Results The satisfaction rate of sampling guided by ultrasonic elastography was 100%(90/90), higher than that guided by traditional ultrasonic 98.9%(89/90) (P>0.05).The accuracy rate of sampling guided by ultrasonic elastography was 91.1%(82/90), higher than that guided by traditional ultrasonic 87.8%(79/90)(P>0.05).Among the latter cases, the accuracy rate of sampling examined by 16G biopsy needle was 86.7%(39/45), lower than that examined by 18G biopsy needle 88.9%(40/45)(P>0.05).Conclusion Ultrasonic elastography-guided fine needle aspiration is slight better than traditional ultrasonic-guided core needle aspiration for the diagnosis of cervical malignant lymph nodes, but without statistical difference.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?